ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2025
Synchronous metastases from colorectal cancer. Treatment and long-term survival compared to patients with metachronous metastases: a population-based study from Central Norway 2001-2015.
Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Real-world management of patients with simultaneously diagnosed synchronous liver and lung metastatic colorectal cancer - a national cohort study.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2026Article
- Capecitabine maintenance after radiofrequency ablation: A preventive strategy for lung oligometastases from colorectal cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReliable and modern information on primary evaluation, treatment, and long-term survival rates for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases are needed. Whether synchronous CRC metastases carry a worse prognosis than metachronous is still debated.
methodsPopulation-based study on 7,950 CRC patients from Central Norway, 2001- 2015. Of these, 1,843 (23.2%) had synchronous metastases and of radically operated patients with stage I-III disease 1,117 (20.1%) developed metachronous metastases. The treatment strategies and outcomes for patients with metastases were analyzed, stratified by three consecutive 5-year periods.
resultsMedian and 3-year survival for patients with synchronous metastases were 11 months and 16.4%, compared to 17 months and 29.4% with metachronous metastases, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively. The subsets receiving supportive care only, had a median survival of 3-4 months. Patients with synchronous metastases and primary palliative chemotherapy had a median survival of 15 months compared to 18 months with metachronous metastases, p < 0.001. Neither groups improved survival across the study period. The 5-year survival for the 342/1,843 (18.6%) patients with synchronous metastases and curative intent treatment was 41.8% compared to 43.6% for the corresponding 422/1,117 (37.8%) patients with metachronous metastases, log-rank p = 0.281. Survival significantly improved for both these groups across the study period.
interpretationA key determinant of better survival for patients with metachronous CRC metastases compared to synchronous was a significantly higher proportion treated with curative intent. Survival for both patients with synchronous and metachronous metastases taken collectively steadily improved during the study period, driven by the increased proportions and improved survival for the subsets with curative intent treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.