Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40534218›Full record

ArticleWater environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation2025

Passive Sampling of Urban Runoff Solids to Capture Environmental DNA for the Detection of Rodents in Urban Spaces.

Mark Edward Jolejole, Mai Uchida, Ayane Itakura, Tomohiro Tobino, Kazunari Sei, Fumiyuki Nakajima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Passive Sampling of Urban Runoff Solids to Capture Environmental DNA for the Detection of Rodents in Urban Spaces.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mark Edward JolejoleDepartment of Urban Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6097-7938
Mai UchidaDepartment of Urban Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Ayane ItakuraDepartment of Urban Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomohiro TobinoDepartment of Urban Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazunari SeiDepartment of Health Science, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Kanagawa, Japan.
Fumiyuki NakajimaEnvironmental Science Center, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

JSPS KAKENHI JP19K21985JSPS KAKENHI JP21K18172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In urban environments, runoff may contain environmental DNA (eDNA) from nuisance animals, but its potential has not been investigated. Conventional eDNA methods, such as water sampling, may not be applicable to the detection of nuisance animals in urban areas due to the scarcity of target eDNA attributable to the sporadic contact of the animals with water sources, and the limited volume of samples collected may lead to false negative results. Given these limitations, this study aimed to develop a passive sampling method for the collection of runoff solids for the detection of rodents (mouse and rat) in urban areas using eDNA. The developed sampling method successfully collected 0.3-16.7 g dry weight of runoff solids per sampling event. Collected runoff samples contained 8.0-58.1 μg total DNA/g dry weight sample and were characterized by the presence of PCR inhibitors. Following the removal of these inhibitors, mouse eDNA was detected (albeit below the limit of quantification) using a designed species-specific assay. The results of this study demonstrate that runoff solids are a viable eDNA source for the detection of animals in urban environments. However, further work is required to improve the quantification of target DNA. Nevertheless, the developed methodology may provide new and important information on the ecology of animals in urban spaces that can be incorporated into the management of nuisance animals in urban areas. SUMMARY: A passive sampling scheme was successfully designed and captured 0.3-16.7 g dry weight of urban runoff solids in two sites in an urban space. Collected solids contain 8.0-58.1 μg/g of eDNA, which also contain PCR inhibitors which must be removed prior to qPCR. Mouse DNA was detected in six out of 19 samples, but the detections were below the determined quantification limit. This new passive sampling scheme can be applied for terrestrial animal detection in urban spaces to potentially track hidden animals.

Indexed as

DNA, EnvironmentalEnvironmental MonitoringAnimalsCitiesMiceRatsDNA, Environmentalenvironmental DNApassive samplingqPCRrodentsurban runoffurban spaces

Identifiers

PMID40534218
PMCPMC12177438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.