ArticleUltrasonography (Seoul, Korea)2025
Ductal abnormalities as primary findings on breast ultrasonography: a literature review and proposed classification.
Article in Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retroareolar Intraductal Lesions Detected by Screening Ultrasound in Dense Breasts: Malignancy Rate and Predictive Imaging Features.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Article
- BI-RADS v2025 for breast ultrasound: key updates and Asian perspectives.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ductal abnormalities, such as dilated ducts with intraductal lesions, are frequently the primary ultrasound findings prompting biopsy and resulting in the early diagnosis of breast cancer or high-risk lesions. However, the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) ultrasound lexicon provides limited guidance on these findings, categorizing them merely as associated features. To address this limitation, this review presents a critical analysis of existing literature and proposes a new classification encompassing three distinct subtypes: dilated ducts alone, dilated ducts with intraductal echoes, and intraductal masses. Additionally, an interpretation algorithm is introduced that incorporates lesion size and suspicious ultrasound features to guide BI-RADS assessment. This structured approach aims to standardize terminology, improve diagnostic accuracy, and promote consistent management of ductal abnormalities, especially in asymptomatic women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.