SynthesisMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2025
CRISPR for cystic fibrosis: Advances and insights from a systematic review.
Synthesis in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combining Gene Therapy with Current Modulator Treatments for Cystic Fibrosis: A Promising Area of Research.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Considerations for early life genetic therapies in cystic fibrosis.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2026Review
- PAM-flexible SpCas9 variants expand the targeting scope for porcine genome editing and cellular disease modeling.BMC biotechnology · 2026Article
- Base editing and nanoparticle transfection of airway cell types essential for treatment of cystic fibrosis.JCI insight · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a severe genetic disorder caused by loss-of-function mutations in the CFTR gene. Gene-editing approaches have the potential to correct such mutations. This systematic review outlines the mechanisms of the main CRISPR-based technologies, and, through cross-study comparisons, analyzes 27 research articles that applied them to target CF-causing variants. We report and discuss the strategy design, target cell selection, editing efficiency, prevalence of editing byproducts, and levels of CFTR functional restoration achieved in each work, with the aim of providing technical insights for further exploration of CRISPR-based gene-editing approaches. Our findings show that the F508del and W1282X mutations were the most extensively studied CF-causing variants, though over fifteen mutations were targeted overall. The majority of works under review explored the use of homology-directed repair or base editing, with a growing number of studies reporting efficient prime editing. Some studies tackled multiple individual mutations, compared different editors, or tested strategies across various models, while others focused on approaches that rescue CFTR function without directly correcting a mutation. Several works also proposed strategies that could address multiple variants with a single approach, while others highlighted technical difficulties in editing certain regions of the CFTR gene. This cross-study comparison also emphasizes the need for standardized reporting of editing efficiency and functional recovery, and stresses the importance of further single-cell RNA sequencing and in vivo studies to reach clinically relevant conclusions. As gene-editing techniques continue to evolve, and with over 60 ongoing CRISPR-based clinical trials, there is growing optimism for meaningful advancements in CF gene-editing therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.