Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40534114›Full record

ReviewMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2025

Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction with Healthcare Services in Poland.

Paulina Mularczyk-Tomczewska, Mariusz Gujski, Julia Maria Koperdowska, Julia Wójcik, Andrzej Silczuk

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paulina Mularczyk-TomczewskaDepartment of Public Health, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8006-3818
Mariusz GujskiDepartment of Public Health, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-2938-4795
Julia Maria KoperdowskaFaculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0009-0004-6949-1052
Julia WójcikFaculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Andrzej SilczukDepartment of Community Psychiatry, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-7048-8094

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient satisfaction is a key indicator of healthcare quality, reflecting individuals' experiences with medical services and healthcare facilities. It is influenced by a wide range of factors, including the quality of care, communication with healthcare providers, accessibility, costs, system organization, and health outcomes. Digitalization of healthcare, including electronic medical records, e-prescriptions, and remote communication tools, is increasingly influencing patient satisfaction by improving accessibility and convenience of care. This review explores the main determinants of patient satisfaction in the context of the Polish healthcare system. The article identifies 6 thematic categories of influencing factors: quality of care, service accessibility and organization, patient-related variables (such as age, gender, or socioeconomic status), financial considerations, digitalization, and achieved health outcomes. Personalized communication and empathetic attitudes from healthcare professionals emerged as key drivers of satisfaction. Additionally, systemic aspects, including wait times and coordination of services, remain critical concerns for Polish patients. The review highlights the tools used to measure satisfaction in Poland, particularly the Patient and Staff Satisfaction Survey Tool (PASAT), developed by the National Center for Quality Monitoring in Healthcare. Regular satisfaction surveys serve not only as an internal quality assessment mechanism but also as a foundation for policy-making and system improvements. Despite numerous partial studies, there is a lack of standardized and comprehensive approaches to evaluating patient satisfaction at the national level. This article reviews the evaluation and determinants of patient satisfaction with healthcare services in Poland. All publications were analyzed using a nonsystematic review method.

Indexed as

Health ServicesPatient SatisfactionDelivery of Health CareHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPolandQuality of Health CareSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID40534114
PMCPMC12186550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.