ArticleAnatomical sciences education2026
Supporting doctors' professional identity development through specialist training.
Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Narrative inquiry for beginners: A practical guide for health professions education researchers.Anatomical sciences education · 2026Review
- More than words: The value of qualitative research for advancing educational practice.Anatomical sciences education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anatomy-centric specialties such as surgery, radiology, and anatomical pathology (AP) have workforce shortages, with attrition during the training phase proposed as a contributing factor. Current understanding of the reasons behind trainee attrition is limited, and there have been calls to increase the depth and richness of research in this area. Exploring trainees' professional identity (PI) development may deepen our understanding of why trainees resign and inform development of appropriate interventions. This study seeks to address this by exploring the field of AP as a model for specialist PI development and asks what factors affirm and/or challenge AP trainees' PI development? A qualitative research approach was undertaken using narrative inquiry. Interviews with AP trainees and consultants in Australia and New Zealand were interpreted as stories through a 're-storying' process. Story data of doctors' AP training experiences were thematically analyzed using framework analysis. Three themes were identified related to anatomy-centric specialist training PI: What trainees do ('learning opportunities'), where trainees learn ('learning environment and context'), and who trainees learn from ('people influencing learning'). 'Learning opportunities' appeared to be a dominant influence on trainees' PI development. Prominent PI challenges included perceptions of incompetence and dependence during the transition to specialist training and perceptions of disconnectedness throughout training. This study extends existing research to suggest ways educators could support trainees navigating perceptions of incompetence and dependence. Our study highlights how disconnectedness may be a factor in trainee attrition-suggesting that future research into this underexplored theme is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.