Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40533895›Full record

ArticleAnatomical sciences education2026

Supporting doctors' professional identity development through specialist training.

Shemona Y Rozario, Melanie K Farlie, Mahbub Sarkar, Michelle D Lazarus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shemona Y RozarioCentre of Human Anatomy Education (CHAE), Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Biomedical Discovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0528-7317
Melanie K FarlieDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6820-1496
Mahbub SarkarMonash Centre for Scholarship in Health Education (MCSHE), Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Michelle D LazarusCentre of Human Anatomy Education (CHAE), Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Biomedical Discovery Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0996-4386

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anatomy-centric specialties such as surgery, radiology, and anatomical pathology (AP) have workforce shortages, with attrition during the training phase proposed as a contributing factor. Current understanding of the reasons behind trainee attrition is limited, and there have been calls to increase the depth and richness of research in this area. Exploring trainees' professional identity (PI) development may deepen our understanding of why trainees resign and inform development of appropriate interventions. This study seeks to address this by exploring the field of AP as a model for specialist PI development and asks what factors affirm and/or challenge AP trainees' PI development? A qualitative research approach was undertaken using narrative inquiry. Interviews with AP trainees and consultants in Australia and New Zealand were interpreted as stories through a 're-storying' process. Story data of doctors' AP training experiences were thematically analyzed using framework analysis. Three themes were identified related to anatomy-centric specialist training PI: What trainees do ('learning opportunities'), where trainees learn ('learning environment and context'), and who trainees learn from ('people influencing learning'). 'Learning opportunities' appeared to be a dominant influence on trainees' PI development. Prominent PI challenges included perceptions of incompetence and dependence during the transition to specialist training and perceptions of disconnectedness throughout training. This study extends existing research to suggest ways educators could support trainees navigating perceptions of incompetence and dependence. Our study highlights how disconnectedness may be a factor in trainee attrition-suggesting that future research into this underexplored theme is warranted.

Indexed as

AnatomyEducation, Medical, GraduatePhysiciansSocial IdentificationAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleNew ZealandQualitative ResearchSpecializationanatomical pathologynarrative inquirypostgraduate trainingprofessional identityqualitative researchspecialty training

Identifiers

PMID40533895
PMCPMC12934375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.