ReviewExperimental hematology & oncology2025
Advances and challenges in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes.
Review in Experimental hematology & oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sequential therapy with decitabine and an XPO-1 inhibitor followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in MDS with biallelic TP53 inactivation patients : a preliminary case series.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026Article
- A complete blood count-based machine learning model for rapid differentiation of aplastic anemia, immune thrombocytopenia, and myelodysplastic syndromes in routine clinical practice.Practical laboratory medicine · 2026Article
- Concomitant plasma cell myeloma and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in elderly: diagnostic complexity, therapeutic challenges - case report and literature review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Case Report: Central nervous system infiltration after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in high-risk myelodysplastic neoplasms.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is a heterogeneous group of pre-leukemic diseases characterized by peripheral blood cytopenia, morphologic dysplasia, and an increased risk of transformation to leukemia. MDS develop from genetically mutant clonal hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) which have defects in generating mature functional blood cells due to impaired differentiation and/or survival activities. In addition, mutant HSPCs also inhibit the generation of new blood cells from remaining healthy HSPCs. Thus, the complete elimination of mutant HSPCs is the optimal goal for MDS treatment. However, most current therapies for MDS are little more than palliative, primarily addressing cytopenia-related symptoms and improving the quality of life. Only the hypomethylating agents (HMA) lenalidomide and imetelstat reduced the mutational burden, and then only in a small subset of cases. Many HMA-based combination therapies failed to show benefits superior to single-agent HMA treatment in clinical trials. At the present time, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is still the only cure for the minority of qualified patients who have HLA-matched donors. Novel effective treatments are urgently needed. Here we summarize the current standard therapeutic approaches for MDS patients and discuss major advances in MDS research and treatments. We also discuss major challenges and potential solutions to overcome these challenges for future MDS research and drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.