ReviewJournal of medical case reports2025
Successful management of a calcified coronary nodule with intravenous lithotripsy: a case report and review of literature.
Review in Journal of medical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCalcified nodules within coronary stents are increasingly recognized as contributors to in-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis, which pose significant cardiovascular risks. Advanced imaging techniques, such as optical coherence tomography, have been crucial in detecting calcified nodules, which are more prevalent in patients undergoing hemodialysis and those with pre-existing calcified lesions. CASE PRESENTATION: A 67-year-old British man with a history of diabetes, hypertension, and heart failure presented with chest pain, dyspnea, and diaphoresis, leading to a diagnosis of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction based on elevated troponin and B-type natriuretic peptide levels. Imaging revealed significant coronary artery disease, including a patent left anterior descending stent with focal stenosis due to a calcified nodule, chronic total occlusion of the left circumflex artery, and right coronary artery occlusion. The patient was treated with intravenous lithotripsy and balloon angioplasty, along with medical therapy, including dual antiplatelet therapy, statins, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and diuretics. The discussion highlights the challenges of managing calcified coronary lesions, comparing rotational atherectomy, intravenous lithotripsy, and conventional stenting techniques. While rotational atherectomy is effective for superficial plaque modification, intravenous lithotripsy offers deeper calcium modification with fewer complications, though both modalities require careful patient selection for optimal outcomes.
conclusionCalcified nodules within coronary stents are a significant cause of in-stent restenosis and thrombosis, leading to adverse cardiovascular events. Advanced imaging techniques such as intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography are crucial for early detection and accurate diagnosis. Effective management of calcified nodule-related lesions remains challenging, with rotational atherectomy and intravenous lithotripsy emerging as viable adjunctive therapies for optimal stent expansion. This case highlights the successful use of rotational atherectomy in treating a patient with severe in-stent calcification presenting with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. A tailored approach combining advanced imaging, lesion preparation, and optimal stent deployment is essential for improving outcomes in patients with complex calcified coronary disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.