Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40533824›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2025

Using radiomics model for predicting extraprostatic extension with PSMA PET/CT studies: a comparative study with the Mehralivand grading system.

Linjie Bian, Fanxuan Liu, Yige Peng, Xinyu Liu, Panli Li, Qiufang Liu, Lei Bi, Shaoli Song

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. [Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Impact ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Multimodal imaging deep learning model for predicting extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer using MpMRI and 18 F-PSMA-PET/CT.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Linjie Bian *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Fanxuan Liu *Institute of Translational Medicine, National Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yige PengInstitute of Translational Medicine, National Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Xinyu LiuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Panli LiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Qiufang LiuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Lei BiInstitute of Translational Medicine, National Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. lei.bi@sjtu.edu.cn.
Shaoli SongDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. shaoli-song@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2544-7522

Funding

Shanghai Hospital Development Center SHDC12023103Shanghai Scientific and Technological Innovation Program 21XD1431300Youth Science Project of the Wuxi Health Committee Q202249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of using a radiomics model to predict extraprostatic extension (EPE) in prostate cancer from PSMA PET/CT, and to directly compare its performance with the Mehralivand Grading System, an MRI-based method for EPE assessment.

methodsA total of 206 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were included in this study. Radiomics features were extracted from PSMA PET/CT images to construct predictive models using Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest algorithms. In addition, among the 63 patients who underwent both PSMA PET/CT and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), the performance of the radiomics model was compared with that of the Mehralivand Grading System. Key performance metrics, including the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV), were reported.

resultsAmong the 63 patients who underwent both PSMA PET/CT and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), the radiomics model achieved an AUC of 76.8% (95% CI: 64.4-86.5%), sensitivity of 72.0%, specificity of 81.5%, PPV of 72.0%, and NPV of 81.6%. In comparison, the Mehralivand Grading System yielded AUCs of 66.8%, 63.5%, and 60.2% from three independent readers. DeLong's test showed that the radiomics model significantly outperformed all three readers in terms of AUC (p = 0.013, 0.003, and 0.001, respectively).

conclusionThe radiomics model derived from PSMA PET/CT can better capture features associated with EPE and shows promise for aiding preoperative assessment in prostate cancer. However, further validation in larger, independent cohorts is necessary to confirm its stability and clinical utility.

Indexed as

Positron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstatic NeoplasmsAgedHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultiparametric Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasm GradingPredictive Value of TestsProstatectomyRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesExtraprostatic extension (EPE)PSMA PET/CTRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID40533824
PMCPMC12177976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.