Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40533800›Full record

ReviewFluids and barriers of the CNS2025

Brain fluid physiology in ischaemic stroke; more than just oedema.

Kirsten G Coupland, Merce Fuentes Amell, Neil J Spratt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kirsten G CouplandSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, The University of Newcastle Australia, Newcastle, Australia. kirsten.coupland@newcastle.edu.au.
Merce Fuentes AmellSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, The University of Newcastle Australia, Newcastle, Australia.
Neil J SprattSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, The University of Newcastle Australia, Newcastle, Australia. neil.spratt@newcastle.edu.au.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP2012600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCerebrospinal fluid and interstitial fluid dynamics are critical for maintaining homeostasis in the central nervous system. These fluids facilitate waste clearance, micronutrient distribution, and provide a tightly regulated ionic environment. Ischaemic stroke, a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, disrupts this delicate system, compounding the physiological challenges posed by the condition. Despite recent advances in our understanding of the importance of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and interstitial fluid (ISF) movement and exchange, the role of this system in stroke pathophysiology remains underexplored. MAIN BODY: Emerging evidence indicates that ischaemic stroke acutely alters CSF and ISF movement and exchange, with effects observed at both local and brain-wide levels. In the hyper-acute phase, there is an influx of CSF into perivascular spaces, potentially contributing to early cell swelling. Over time, impaired clearance mechanisms exacerbate ionic and vasogenic oedema, elevating intracranial pressure and further compromising perfusion in the ischaemic penumbra. Mechanistic studies suggest that disruptions in arterial pulsatility, extracellular space microstructure, and aquaporin 4 localisation may underlie these changes. Experimental models have revealed decreased CSF and ISF exchange, movement and outflow in the hours to days following stroke, with implications for waste clearance and secondary injury processes. The interplay between these dynamics and cortical spreading depolarisations, stroke severity, and cerebrovascular physiology adds complexity to understanding the condition's progression.

conclusionThe disruption of CSF and ISF movement and exchange may represent a significant, yet underappreciated contributor to post-stroke pathology. Addressing these alterations could offer novel therapeutic avenues to mitigate secondary damage, improve central nervous system (CNS) homeostasis, and enhance recovery outcomes. Future research must focus on elucidating the precise mechanisms of CSF and ISF movement and exchange disturbance and exploring targeted interventions to restore normal fluid dynamics in the CNS post-stroke.

Indexed as

BrainBrain EdemaCerebrospinal FluidExtracellular FluidIschemic StrokeAnimalsHumansCerebral oedemaCerebrospinal fluidCerebrospinal fluid effluxGlymphaticsIntracranial pressureStrokeStroke pathophysiology

Identifiers

PMID40533800
PMCPMC12175363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.