ReviewFluids and barriers of the CNS2025
Brain fluid physiology in ischaemic stroke; more than just oedema.
Review in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Glymphatic-Immune Axis in Glioblastoma: Mechanistic Insights and Translational Opportunities.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Post-stroke glymphatic and meningeal lymphatic dysfunction: mechanisms, imaging evidence, and translational challenges.Frontiers in stroke · 2026Review
- Lateralized glymphatic system impairment in acute ischemic stroke: a DTI-ALPS study of upper limb motor function.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCerebrospinal fluid and interstitial fluid dynamics are critical for maintaining homeostasis in the central nervous system. These fluids facilitate waste clearance, micronutrient distribution, and provide a tightly regulated ionic environment. Ischaemic stroke, a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, disrupts this delicate system, compounding the physiological challenges posed by the condition. Despite recent advances in our understanding of the importance of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and interstitial fluid (ISF) movement and exchange, the role of this system in stroke pathophysiology remains underexplored. MAIN BODY: Emerging evidence indicates that ischaemic stroke acutely alters CSF and ISF movement and exchange, with effects observed at both local and brain-wide levels. In the hyper-acute phase, there is an influx of CSF into perivascular spaces, potentially contributing to early cell swelling. Over time, impaired clearance mechanisms exacerbate ionic and vasogenic oedema, elevating intracranial pressure and further compromising perfusion in the ischaemic penumbra. Mechanistic studies suggest that disruptions in arterial pulsatility, extracellular space microstructure, and aquaporin 4 localisation may underlie these changes. Experimental models have revealed decreased CSF and ISF exchange, movement and outflow in the hours to days following stroke, with implications for waste clearance and secondary injury processes. The interplay between these dynamics and cortical spreading depolarisations, stroke severity, and cerebrovascular physiology adds complexity to understanding the condition's progression.
conclusionThe disruption of CSF and ISF movement and exchange may represent a significant, yet underappreciated contributor to post-stroke pathology. Addressing these alterations could offer novel therapeutic avenues to mitigate secondary damage, improve central nervous system (CNS) homeostasis, and enhance recovery outcomes. Future research must focus on elucidating the precise mechanisms of CSF and ISF movement and exchange disturbance and exploring targeted interventions to restore normal fluid dynamics in the CNS post-stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.