ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2025
Healthcare professionals' perceptions of electronic prescription systems in outpatient services: a qualitative study at UNS hospital.
Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe outpatient prescription service at UNS Hospital has traditionally relied on paper-based prescriptions. The outpatient prescription service at UNS Hospital is transitioning from paper-based to electronic prescription systems (EPSs). While existing literature highlights EPS benefits, gaps remain in understanding healthcare professionals' subjective experiences during implementation. This qualitative study explores doctors' and pharmacists' perceptions regarding the motivations, benefits, challenges, readiness, and system development suggestions for EPS implementation in outpatient services at UNS Hospital.
methodsIn-depth interviews were conducted with six doctors and four pharmacists between January and April 2024. The study participants were prescription doctors and pharmacists at UNS Hospital. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis techniques. Thematic analysis was used to identify the themes that emerged from the interviews.
resultsFive themes emerged: (1) Motivations centered on reducing medication errors and enhancing operational efficiency; (2) Benefits included improved communication, cost control, and streamlined workflows; (3) Readiness revealed pharmacists' enthusiasm versus doctors' cautious adaptation. (4) System suggestions emphasized real-time drug stock integration and advanced search features. (5)Electronic Prescription System Features included Information on adverse drug reaction.
conclusionWhile healthcare professionals perceive EPS as beneficial for safety and efficiency, addressing challenges like user training and system interoperability is critical for successful adoption. Implementing participant-driven suggestions, such as real-time inventory alerts, could optimize EPS effectiveness. These insights provide actionable strategies for hospitals transitioning to digital prescribing systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.