ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025
Performance of the Oncuria-Detect bladder cancer test for evaluating patients presenting with haematuria: results from a real-world clinical setting.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Validation of a Multiplex Urine Biomarker Assay for Surveillance of Recurrent Bladder Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Article
- A comprehensive plasma-based approach to thromboinflammation in bladder cancer: integrating lipidomics, thrombin generation, and NETosis biomarkers.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Detection of bladder cancer in patients with microscopic hematuria using Oncuria-Detect: results of a prospective, multicenter international study.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of the Oncuria-Detect Multiplex Immunoassay in Detecting Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.The Journal of urology · 2026Article
- A high-throughput photothermal aptasensing platform using MnO₂@CuS nanoprobes for noninvasive detection of bladder cancer cells in simulated liquid biopsy.Mikrochimica acta · 2026Article
- Hematuria Cancer Risk Score in Combination With Oncuria-Detect for Patients Undergoing Evaluation for Hematuria.Urology · 2026Article
- Bladder Cancer Biomarkers: Recent Advances in Early Detection, Treatment Prediction, and Prognosis.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Urinary bladder cancer needs more attention - recommendations for health care professionals and politicians in the European Union.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Developing a prediction model in a large case-control study for the early detection of bladder cancer.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBladder cancer is the 9th most diagnosed cancer worldwide with high incidences reported in Europe and the United States. Here, we evaluated the real-world performance of a commercially available multiplex immunoassay (Oncuria-Detect, Nonagen Bioscience Corp, Los Angeles, CA, USA) that detects bladder cancer by simultaneously measuring a panel of 10 protein biomarkers in naturally voided urine samples.
methodsWe tested prospectively collected urine samples from a real-world cohort of 931 patients presenting to five US centres, one European centre and one Japanese centre with haematuria, in addition to 69 patients with either kidney or prostate cancer (disease controls). The algorithm training/refinement set comprised 617 subjects and the test set included 383 subjects. Assay results were collated with patient clinical data and a cancer diagnosis was defined by biopsy and pathology. The prevalence of bladder cancer in the study was 20%.
resultsIn the training set, the Oncuria-Detect assay correctly identified bladder cancer in 105 of 121 cases. In the test set, the Oncuria-Detect assay correctly identified bladder cancer in 62 of 73 cases resulting in a sensitivity of 85%, a specificity of 72%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 95%. The performance of Oncuria was similar for both low-grade/low-stage and high-grade/high-stage.
conclusionsThe multiplex Oncuria assay identified bladder cancer with high sensitivity and NPV. Oncuria's high NPV could effectively rule out 66% of patients from requiring subsequent cystoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.