Observational studyWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2025
Laparoscopic appendectomy as the gold standard: What role remains for open surgery, conversion, and disease severity? : An analysis of 32,000 cases with appendicitis in Germany.
Observational study in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06558760 (Continuous Decline in Open Appendectomies to 0.9% and Conversions to 2%), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Continuous Decline in Open Appendectomies to 0.9% and Conversions to 2%
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of Sex, Age, and Inflammatory Cell Counts with Complicated Acute Appendicitis.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic Versus Open Approach for Strangulated Small Bowel Obstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.World journal of surgery · 2026Article
- From Open to Robot-Assisted Pancreatoduodenectomy: What RCTs Really Show.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Evolving Paradigms in Minimal Access Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendicectomy.Cureus · 2026Review
- Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis in Sub-Saharan Africa.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Routine Group-and-Save (G+S) Testing Prior to Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A 10-Year Single-Centre Review.Cureus · 2025Article
- Comparative study of early versus interval appendicectomy in appendicular mass.Bioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute appendicitis is a common abdominal surgical emergency and is a major cause of acute abdomen in more than 20% of cases. Although various studies have been conducted in recent years on topics such as surgical techniques and antibiotic treatment of appendicitis, today there is a lack of large-scale studies focused on the different severity levels of acute appendicitis and their management. The study aimed to analyze the severity, types of surgical techniques, and mortality associated with acute appendicitis to identify possible developments.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective multicenter observational study based on routine data from 2010 to 2022. Patients over 18 years old with acute appendicitis were included and the following data were collected: patient demographics, comorbidities, type of surgery, complications, admission to ICU, length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. A total of 31,988 patients were included in the study.
resultsAt the end of the study, 97.0% (P < .001) of the patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy, with 86% of cases involving closure of the appendix stump by stapler (P < .001). It was only from 2014 onwards that more than 90% of surgeries were performed laparoscopically, and from 2017, this figure rose to 95%. Complicated appendicitis was present in 27.4% of cases. The distribution of severity was as follows: unspecified acute appendicitis in 39.5%, appendicitis with local peritonitis in 33.1%, appendicitis with local peritonitis and perforation in 17.1%, appendicitis with peritoneal abscess in 5.4%, and appendicitis with generalized peritonitis in 4.9%. Women had a significantly lower risk for conversion to an open operation than men (P < .001). The highest morbidity was observed in the group that converted from laparoscopy to open surgery (P <.001). Non-surgical treatment of appendicitis was not relevant, accounting for only 4% of cases.
conclusionSince 2017, primary laparoscopic appendectomy has been the gold standard for even complicated acute appendicitis (> 95% annually). Over three-quarters of patients undergo an appendectomy with a stapler, making this surgical technique the preferred method of laparoscopic surgery in Germany. Patients who undergo an interoperative switch to open therapy should be considered a subgroup at risk of increased mortality.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06558760.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.