ArticleAnnals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials2025
SARS-CoV-2 coinfection in patients with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: clinical characteristics and prognosis.
Article in Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Amphotericin B promotes respiratory viral entry by enhancing late endosomal maturation and fusion via glucocerebrosidase-mediated ceramide remodeling.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Comparative clinical features and outcomes of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis following influenzaFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCOVID-19 associated pulmonary aspergillosis (CAPA) has been globally reported to be a life-threatening complication of severe COVID-19. Previous studies primarily focused on an association between secondary Aspergillus infection and elevated mortality risk in COVID-19 patients, while potential confounding factors and alternative pathogenic mechanisms remain insufficiently investigated. The risk factors and outcomes of patients with secondary SARS-CoV-2 infection following invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) were not been well explored either.
methodsThis retrospective monocentric study enrolled 152 hospitalized IPA patients with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection from 1 November 2022 to 31 October 2023. The characteristics of IPA patients and related risk factors were investigated, and the relationship between different SARS-CoV-2 infection status and the prognosis in IPA patients was further evaluated.
resultsOur analysis demonstrated that IPA patients subsequently diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection exhibited significantly elevated mortality risk compared to those without viral coinfection (53.6% vs. 22.9%, P < 0.001). SARS-CoV-2 infection status (OR 3.708; P = 0.001; 95%CI 1.674-8.212), albumin concentration (OR 0.885; P = 0.005; 95%CI 0.813-0.964), and C-reactive protein level (OR 1.007; P = 0.012; 95%CI 1.002-1.013) were statistically significant independent risk factors for prognosis of IPA patients. Subsequent analysis established a multivariate risk prediction model incorporating independent prognostic factors, which exhibited robust discriminative capacity for mortality risk stratification via ROC curve validation (AUC = 0.792, 95%CI 0.721-0.862, P < 0.0001). A statistically significant difference in mortality rate existed between IPA patients with secondary SARS-CoV-2 infection and CAPA patients (63.2% and 33.3%, P = 0.037). Notably, comparative analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in 28-day (22/96, 22.9% vs. 6/18, 33.3%) or 90-day mortality rates (22/96, 22.9% vs. 6/18, 33.3%) between patients with IPA without SARS-CoV-2 infection and IPA patients with secondary SARS-CoV-2 infection.
conclusionsIPA patients with secondary SARS-CoV-2 coinfection had a lower mortality compared to those with CAPA. Considering the high mortality rate, more medical cares are needed for these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.