Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40533716›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025

Ensemble perception requires attention.

Ruth Kimchi, Shahar Sabary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Limited effects of action on ensemble processing.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ruth KimchiSchool of Psychological Sciences, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel. rkimchi@univ.haifa.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4576-8094
Shahar SabaryInstitute of Information Processing and Decision Making, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.

Funding

Israel Science Foundation Grant No. 2146/22
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The question of whether ensemble perception can take place without attention is unresolved. We examined this issue in four experiments, using an inattention paradigm that provides an on-line, indirect measure of processing of unattended stimuli. Participants performed an attention-demanding change-detection task on a small matrix presented on a background of task-irrelevant ensemble consisting of circles of different size (Experiment 1) or oriented lines (Experiments 2-4). Independently of any change in the matrix, the ensemble mean changed or stayed the same between successive displays on each trial. We hypothesized that if ensemble mean is extracted under inattention, changes in the ensemble mean would produce congruency effects on the speed or accuracy of performance in the matrix change judgments, such that performance is faster or more accurate on congruent than incongruent trials. The results showed that changes in the ensemble mean size or mean orientation produced no congruency effects on performance of the target change-detection task. Also, participants could not report, when probed with surprise questions, whether or not the ensemble mean changed. When participants attended to the ensemble, their accuracy of explicit reports about a change were significantly above chance. These results are seen to suggest that ensemble perception requires attention. The differences between the present study and previous ones, concerning the conditions and definition of unattended and their implication for understanding the relation between ensemble perception and attention, are discussed.

Indexed as

AttentionDiscrimination, PsychologicalOrientationPattern Recognition, VisualSize PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansJudgmentMaleReaction TimeYoung AdultAttentionAutomatic processingEnsemble perceptionImplicit processingUnattended processing

Identifiers

PMID40533716
PMCPMC12331843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.