ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025
Effect of pretreatment lab abnormalities on the time-to-treatment discontinuation and overall survival of metastatic breast cancer patients receiving CDK 4/6i, PI3Ki, and/or mTORi.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Liver metastases of hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients: an ominous sign.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeMetastatic breast cancer (MBC) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enroll healthier patients than the general population; however, many women have a lab abnormality at the time of their diagnosis, RCTs inadequately represent this patient population. To better understand this population, this study estimated time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS) for patients with and without lab abnormalities receiving a targeted therapy for MBC.
methodsThis retrospective study used the nationwide, de-identified electronic health record-derived Flatiron Health database to include women with hormone receptor-positive, Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- negative MBC with receipt of a targeted therapy between 2011 and 2020. Abnormalities were defined by common exclusionary cut-offs in targeted therapy clinical trials. TTD was defined as time from treatment initiation to the first occurrence of either treatment change or death. The secondary outcome was OS defined as time from treatment initiation to death from any cause. Accelerated failure time models estimating the survival time ratio, predicted mean survival time differences, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used for the association between lab abnormalities and TTD or OS.
resultsAmong patients with receipt of a CDK 4/6 inhibitor, patients with at least one lab abnormality had a 33% shorter TTD (MR 0.67; 95% CI 0.59, 0.68) and 25% shorter OS (MR 0.75; 95% CI 0.70, 0.81) than those with no lab abnormalities. More modest differences were seen in TTD and OS for patients with receipt of Everolimus or Alpelisib. Patients saw the largest impact with liver abnormalities with 25% to 45% shorter TTD and 38% to 66% shorter OS across the treatment types. Interestingly, while only patients with receipt of a CDK 4/6i saw significantly shorter TTD for patients with blood abnormalities, patients with receipt of Alpelisib additionally saw shorter OS.
conclusionPatients with lab abnormalities saw significantly lower TTD and OS than those without abnormalities. Patients with liver abnormalities saw significantly shorter TTD and OS across all treatments likely driving this association. More real-world studies of patients with lab abnormalities are needed to empower oncologists when making treatment decisions in high-risk populations, to discuss prognosis and to inform RCT eligibility criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.