ArticleInterdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences2026
Automated Multi-grade Brain Tumor Classification Using Adaptive Hierarchical Optimized Horse Herd BiLSTM Fusion Network in MRI Images.
Article in Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- ResSGA-Net: A deep learning approach for enhanced brain tumor detection and accurate classification in healthcare imaging systems.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Utilizing deep learning algorithms for the early identification and categorization of skin cancer.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain tumor classification using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) images is an important and emerging field of medical imaging and artificial intelligence in the current world. With advancements in technology, particularly in deep learning and machine learning, researchers and clinicians are leveraging these tools to create complex models that, using MRI data, can reliably detect and classify tumors in the brain. However, it has a number of drawbacks, including the intricacy of tumor types and grades, intensity variations in MRI data and tumors varying in severity. This paper proposes a Multi-Grade Hierarchical Classification Network Model (MGHCN) for the hierarchical classification of tumor grades in MRI images. The model's distinctive feature lies in its ability to categorize tumors into multiple grades, thereby capturing the hierarchical nature of tumor severity. To address variations in intensity levels across different MRI samples, an Improved Adaptive Intensity Normalization (IAIN) pre-processing step is employed. This step standardizes intensity values, effectively mitigating the impact of intensity variations and ensuring more consistent analyses. The model renders utilization of the Dual Tree Complex Wavelet Transform with Enhanced Trigonometric Features (DTCWT-ETF) for efficient feature extraction. DTCWT-ETF captures both spatial and frequency characteristics, allowing the model to distinguish between different tumor types more effectively. In the classification stage, the framework introduces the Adaptive Hierarchical Optimized Horse Herd BiLSTM Fusion Network (AHOHH-BiLSTM). This multi-grade classification model is designed with a comprehensive architecture, including distinct layers that enhance the learning process and adaptively refine parameters. The purpose of this study is to improve the precision of distinguishing different grades of tumors in MRI images. To evaluate the proposed MGHCN framework, a set of evaluation metrics is incorporated which includes precision, recall, and the F1-score. The structure employs BraTS Challenge 2021, Br35H, and BraTS Challenge 2023 datasets, a significant combination that ensures comprehensive training and evaluation. The MGHCN framework aims to enhance brain tumor classification in MRI images by utilizing these datasets along with a comprehensive set of evaluation metrics, providing a more thorough and sophisticated understanding of its capabilities and performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40533703What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.