ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2025
Short-Term Adaptations to Lifting and Gait Kinematics When Using a Passive Back-Support Exoskeleton.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prior work quantifying the biomechanical effects of back-support exoskeleton use has mostly focused on the effects of brief periods of exposures to exoskeletons. Hence, there is currently limited understanding of how movement kinematics may be altered by more prolonged exposures. We assessed the effects of a 75-min exposure to a passive back-support exoskeleton on adaptations to lifting strategies, gait kinematics, and postural stability. Twelve participants performed tasks in an ABA protocol-measurements were obtained before (Pre-EXO phase), during (EXO-adaptation phase), and after exoskeleton-use (Post-EXO phase). A piecewise linear regression model was used to estimate changes to the dependent variables within and between each phase. Trunk range of motion (ROM), peak trunk flexion angle, and flexion velocity showed significant decrease (6-8%) on introduction of the exoskeleton, and significant reversals on doffing the exoskeleton. However, there were no significant adaptation effects (changes during EXO-adaptation phase) to trunk kinematics. For gait, a more cautious gait pattern was observed during exoskeleton-use: step length decreased, step width increased, minimum toe clearance increased, and hip ROM decreased, compared to the baseline Pre-EXO phase. These measures also reversed on doffing the exoskeleton and demonstrated further carry-over effects during the Post-EXO phase. However, no significant adaptations were evident in gait kinematics. Exoskeleton introduction, use, and doffing did not alter the cycle-to-cycle variability of trunk kinematics, or postural stability during static stance and maximum leans. These findings can help guide the practical development of training and use protocols for safe exoskeleton use in occupational settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.