ArticleBehavior research methods2025
Smartphone eye-tracking with deep learning: Data quality and field testing.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Smartphone gaze-tracking for accessible psychiatric assessment.Npj mental health research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eye-tracking is widely used to measure human attention in research, commercial, and clinical applications. With the rapid advancements in artificial intelligence and mobile computing, deep learning algorithms for computer vision-based eye tracking have become feasible for smartphones. This paper presents a real-time smartphone eye-tracking system built upon a deep neural network trained on a dataset of 7.4 million facial images. The tracking performance of the system was benchmarked against an industrial gold-standard EyeLink eye tracker using a reasonably large sample (N = 32). The benchmark test showed that, while the smartphone eye-tracking system was less precise (0.177° vs. 0.028°), its tracking accuracy was comparable to the EyeLink tracker (1.32° vs. 1.20°). To evaluate whether the smartphone eye-tracking system is sensitive enough for real-world application, a field test involving 98 volunteers assessed depressive symptoms using three simple visual tasks on a smartphone: fixation stability, free-viewing, and smooth pursuit. The results showed that using the smartphone eye-tracking system can achieve an accuracy of 76.67% in predicting depressive symptoms. These results demonstrate that smartphone eye-tracking can deliver quality data and has potential in scientific and clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40533681What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.