Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40533657›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2026

Prostate Cancer Screening: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices by Medical Doctors in Portugal.

Raquel Braga, Samantha Morais, Luís Pacheco-Figueiredo, Natália Araújo, Nuno Lunet

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Raquel BragaUnidade de Saúde Familiar Lagoa - ULS Matosinhos, Matosinhos, Portugal. raquel.braga@ulsm.min-saude.pt.ORCID 0000-0003-3550-1350
Samantha MoraisInstitute of Public Health of the University Porto, EPIUnit ITR, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Luís Pacheco-FigueiredoGrupo Trofa Saúde - Serviço de Urologia, Braga, Portugal.
Natália AraújoInstitute of Public Health of the University Porto, EPIUnit ITR, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Nuno LunetInstitute of Public Health of the University Porto, EPIUnit ITR, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior https://doi.org/10.54499/LA/P/0064/2020)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opportunistic prostate cancer (PCa) screening is common worldwide, with physicians playing an important role in its uptake and consequences. This study explores the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of family doctors and urologists in Portugal regarding PCa screening. A national online survey was conducted between November 2020 and February 2021. Family doctors and urologists were reached by email through their national medical associations, for a total of 596 and 63 participants from each group, respectively. Urologists considered themselves more updated with PCa screening practices than family doctors (93.0% vs. 73.1%; p < 0.001). Family doctors were more likely to consider older age (97.2% vs. 90.9%; p = 0.025) and smoking (80.6% vs. 31.7%; p < 0.001) as risk factors for PCa. Most urologists reported following the European Association of Urology Guidelines for PCa screening (90.9%), while family doctors preferred the National Guidelines (73.9%). A higher proportion of urologists believed early diagnosis is essential for improving PCa prognosis (92.9% vs. 67.9%; p < 0.001). Urologists were more likely to recommend prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing for age group-eligible males (always or almost always: 77.2% vs. 20.4%; p < 0.001) and to perform digital rectal examination (never or rarely: 3.5% vs. 96.2%; p < 0.001). Overall, 65.1% of doctors believed that magnetic resonance imaging could improve the diagnosis of PCa in patients with high PSA levels. Family doctors and urologists differed in their knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding PCa screening. The latter are more interventive and believe more in the benefits of PCa screening.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEarly Detection of CancerHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePhysicians, FamilyPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prostatic NeoplasmsUrologistsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPortugalProstate-Specific AntigenSurveys and QuestionnairesProstate-Specific AntigenEarly detection of cancerFamily physiciansProstate-specific antigenProstatic neoplasmUrologists

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.