ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Extubation on the Operating Table in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery: A Multicenter Analysis of 986 Patients.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ultra-fast-track anesthesia in cardiac surgery: perioperative outcomes, patient selection, and implementation strategies-a narrative review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extubation on the operating table is increasingly utilized to minimize ventilator-associated complications and promote early recovery in pediatric cardiac surgery. However, its safety across diverse congenital heart disease (CHD) populations remains insufficiently defined. To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of on-table extubation across a broad spectrum of corrective and palliative congenital heart surgeries in children. This retrospective multicenter study included 986 pediatric patients (aged 7 days to 16 years) who underwent on-table extubation after CHD surgery between 2019 and 2025. Patients were grouped as corrective (n = 632) or palliative (n = 354) cases. Primary outcomes were reintubation and mortality. Secondary outcomes included ICU and hospital stay durations, and incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). Overall reintubation and mortality rates were 5.78 and 1.22%, respectively. Corrective procedures demonstrated significantly lower reintubation (4.11%) and mortality (0.63%) compared to palliative surgeries (8.76 and 2.26%, respectively; p < 0.01 and p < 0.05). Highest complication rates were observed in HLHS (reintubation and mortality 40%) and aortopulmonary shunt (53.13 and 21.88%). In contrast, Glenn and Fontan procedures showed low reintubation (1.69, 2.91%) and minimal mortality. No cases of VAP were reported. Mean ICU and hospital stays were 3.69 and 9.7 days. Of the 57 reintubation events, 23 (40.4%) occurred within 6 h of extubation, suggesting extubation failure, while 34 (59.6%) occurred between 6 and 24 h, potentially due to secondary complications. Early reintubations (0-6 h) were more common in aortopulmonary shunt (17 cases) and coarctation/IAA repair (3 cases), whereas later reintubations (6-24 h) predominated in ToF (5 cases), truncus arteriosus (4 cases), and TGA (3 cases). A moderate correlation was found between reintubation and mortality (Spearman's r = 0.45, p < 0.01). On-table extubation is a safe and feasible strategy in pediatric cardiac surgery, particularly in corrective procedures and select single-ventricle palliation. However, caution is warranted in high-risk physiologies such as HLHS and shunt-dependent circulation. Careful perioperative evaluation remains essential for optimal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.