ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
A retrospective comparison between DaVinci XI and DaVinci SP robotic-assisted cholecystectomies.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Current status of single-port robotic surgery in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: technical aspects of review.Annals of surgical treatment and research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Determine procedure and patient outcome differences between multiport robotic-assisted cholecystectomies and single port robotic assisted cholecystectomies. We are retrospectively comparing clinical data from patients that have received cholecystectomy procedure using DaVinci XI (MPC) and SP (SPC) by two surgeons between December 2021 and April 2023. There was a total of 119 patients; 99 patients underwent robotic-assisted multiport cholecystectomy using DaVinci XI (MPC) and 20 patients underwent robotic-assisted single port cholecystectomy using DaVinci SP (SPC). Patient data including demographics, robotic operation time and postoperative complications were collected retrospectively and analyzed using unpaired t-test with p-value < 0.05. The comparison will focus on patient demographics, robotic procedure time, post-operative complications between the two patient groups, multiport robotic-assisted cholecystectomy and single port robotic-assisted cholecystectomy. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications in all 119 patient procedures. There was no significant difference between active procedure time between multiport DaVinci XI and single port DaVinci SP (14.78 ± 9.7, 11.75 ± 3.16 (p = 0.386). The non significance decreases in active procedure time and no intraoperative, postoperative complications suggest single port cholecystectomy can be considered as a safe option for robotic-assisted cholecystectomy and should be considered as an alternative for patients especially for cosmetic appeal. This study was reviewed and granted exemption under TUC IRB Review Board (# M-1324).
Indexed as
Identifiers
40533634What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.