ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Generalist medical foundation model improves prostate cancer segmentation from multimodal MRI images.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Foundation models in healthcare: a comprehensive review from technical advances to clinical translation.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- PAM: a propagation-based model for segmenting any 3D objects across multi-modal medical images.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common types of cancer, seriously affecting adult male health. Accurate and automated PCa segmentation is essential for radiologists to confirm the location of cancer, evaluate its severity, and design appropriate treatments. This paper presents PCaSAM, a fully automated PCa segmentation model that allows us to input multi-modal MRI images into the foundation model to improve performance significantly. We collected multi-center datasets to conduct a comprehensive evaluation. The results showed that PCaSAM outperforms the generalist medical foundation model and the other representative segmentation models, with the average DSC of 0.721 and 0.706 in the internal and external datasets, respectively. Furthermore, with the assistance of segmentation, the PI-RADS scoring of PCa lesions was improved significantly, leading to a substantial increase in average AUC by 8.3-8.9% on two external datasets. Besides, PCaSAM achieved superior efficiency, making it highly suitable for real-world deployment scenarios.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.