ArticleBMJ open2025
Patient experience of treatment burden in chronic heart failure self-care interventions: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Heterogeneity of eHealth literacy and treatment burden in older adults with heart failure: a multidimensional latent profile analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionChronic heart failure management can involve considerable healthcare workload for the patient that impacts on well-being and results in treatment being perceived as burdensome. This can result in non-adherence to treatments. This systematic review aims to identify, appraise and synthesise the available qualitative evidence exploring the experience of treatment burden in heart failure patients participating in a self-care intervention. Findings will provide an in-depth understanding of the patient journey, providing knowledge that will enable the development of targeted interventions that reduce the burden of treatment for patients. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: The databases will include Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane and Web of Science. The review protocol is registered in the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO ID no 1052512). This review will systematically scour qualitative research studies in databases from 2010 to January 2025 with carefully chosen search terms such as heart failure, self-care and burden. Searches are limited to studies in English. Two reviewers, guided by the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research, will independently appraise the methodological quality of the selected studies. Any disagreements will be resolved through discussion with a third reviewer. This review will employ a rigorous thematic synthesis approach informed by the burden of treatment theory, where two researchers will analyse and synthesise data by double-coding. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review as primary data will not be collected. The result of the review will be disseminated through publication in an academic journal and scientific conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: ID 1052512.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.