Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40533222›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Enhancing early detection and treatment of psychosis in Germany: a protocol for the health economic evaluation of an artificial intelligence-guided complex intervention.

Trutz Bommhardt, Jens Peschl, Frauke Schultze-Lutter, Nikolaos Koutsouleris, Eva Meisenzahl, Juliane Köberlein-Neu, CARE Study Group

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05813080 (Computer-assisted Risk Evaluation in the Early Detection of Psychotic Disorders), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05813080 nacompletednot on this map

Computer-assisted Risk Evaluation in the Early Detection of Psychotic Disorders

TypeinterventionalSponsorHeinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfRan2023 to 2025Enrolled260ConditionsPsychotic Disorders, PreventionArms"pronia.ai" medical device for high risk psychosis prognosis, Treatment-as-usual (TAU)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Trutz BommhardtCenter for Health Economics and Health Services Research, University of Wuppertal Schumpeter Faculty of Management and Economics - School of Business and Economics, Wuppertal, Germany bommhardt@wiwi.uni-wuppertal.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-1748-1073
Jens PeschlPsychiatry and Psychotherapy, LVR-Klinikum Düsseldorf - Clinics of the Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Frauke Schultze-LutterPsychiatry and Psychotherapy, LVR-Klinikum Düsseldorf - Clinics of the Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Nikolaos KoutsoulerisLudwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munich, Munich, Germany.
Eva MeisenzahlPsychiatry and Psychotherapy, LVR-Klinikum Düsseldorf - Clinics of the Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Juliane Köberlein-NeuCenter for Health Economics and Health Services Research, University of Wuppertal Schumpeter Faculty of Management and Economics - School of Business and Economics, Wuppertal, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3451-7847
CARE Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPsychosis, characterised by chronic symptoms often emerging in youth, imposes a substantial burden on individuals and healthcare systems. While early detection and intervention can mitigate this burden, there is limited evidence on the cost-effectiveness of such approaches. To address this lack of evidence, this study protocol outlines the health economic implications of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based intervention, the Computer-Assisted Risk-Evaluation (CARE), designed to prevent psychosis. The intervention uses AI technologies to enhance the diagnosis and treatment quality for individuals at high risk of psychosis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The health economic evaluation has been designed alongside a 12-month multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing CARE with treatment as usual from both payer and societal perspectives. An implementation cost analysis will complement the evaluation, and long-term consequences beyond the trial will be explored descriptively. Based on a literature review, an initial economic logic model will guide subsequent analyses by depicting CARE's programme theory.The cost-effectiveness assessment will include averted cases of manifest psychosis and quality-adjusted life-years using the EuroQol 5-Dimensions 3-Level instrument. Other effectiveness outcomes will also be incorporated into a cost-consequence analysis. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves reflecting statistical uncertainty will be constructed, incorporating various payer and societal willingness-to-pay values. The implementation cost analysis will follow a mixed-methods approach to capture facility-specific costs.A dark logic model, emphasising negative outcomes, will be developed to investigate long-term consequences. Further, the initial economic logic model will be refined using trial data and expert interviews. This comprehensive approach aims to provide decision-makers not only with evidence on the cost-effectiveness of CARE, but also with a broader understanding of the implications of the intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received ethical approval and plans to disseminate its findings through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05813080.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePsychotic DisordersAdolescentCost-Benefit AnalysisEarly DiagnosisGermanyHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicQuality-Adjusted Life YearsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicHEALTH ECONOMICSPrimary PreventionPSYCHIATRYSchizophrenia & psychotic disorders

Identifiers

PMID40533222
PMCPMC12182174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.