SynthesisBMJ open2025
Experiences of adopting remote technologies for blood pressure control among women with pre-eclampsia and healthcare providers: a systematic review of qualitative studies.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unlocking the Adoption of a Smartphone Application for High-Risk Pregnant Women in the Lao People's Democratic Republic: A Mixed-Methods Study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPre-eclampsia is a harmful and potentially life-threatening condition affecting maternal health and fetal well-being. In response to the need for timely and continuous monitoring, remote health technologies have been implemented for blood pressure control among this group over the last decades. The purpose of this study is to synthesise qualitative evidence on the experiences of adopting remote technologies for blood pressure control among women with pre-eclampsia and their healthcare providers.
methodsPeer-reviewed publications published in English from January 2013 to March 2023 were searched using seven electronic databases: PubMed, Nursing & Allied Health Premium (ProQuest), Scopus, ScienceDirect, Taylor & Francis Online, Google Scholar and EBSCO Open Dissertations. The findings were subjected to meta-synthesis using the Joanna Briggs Institute meta-aggregation approach, whereby credible and unequivocal findings supported by participant quotations were extracted, grouped into categories and then integrated into synthesised findings through consensus among reviewers. A total of 4827 studies were identified in the initial database search. Twelve eligible studies were included in the meta-synthesis.
resultsAmong 12 studies, five synthesised findings were elicited from women's experiences with remote monitoring, including reassurance and increased self-confidence in health, a sense of autonomy, enhanced awareness of their health, acceptability and satisfaction with telehealth and reduced anxiety and stress. Providers' perspectives on telehealth were presented in four synthesised findings: increasing value for oneself and work, strengthening knowledge and skills on pre-eclampsia, improving quality of care and concerns about technology challenges.
conclusionHealthcare providers reported professional growth and improved care delivery, though technical challenges persist. These findings support the integration of remote monitoring into maternal healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.