Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40533212›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Validation of urinary biomarkers for accurate diagnosis of urinary tract infections in older adults across primary care, hospitals and long-term care facilities in the Netherlands and UK (UTI-GOLD): a multicentre observational study protocol.

Nora El Moussaoui, Esther van Andel, Martha T van der Beek, Jessica A Vlot, Manu P Bilsen, Cees van Nieuwkoop, Fanny N Lauw, Nathalie M Delfos, Janneke E Stalenhoef, Martijn Sijbom and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06610721 ('Improving Urinary Tract Infection Diagnosis in Older Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06610721 recruitingnot on this map

'Improving Urinary Tract Infection Diagnosis in Older Patients: Validation of a Biomarker Panel (UTI-GOLD)'

TypeobservationalSponsorLeiden University Medical CenterRan2024 to 2026Enrolled264ConditionsUrinary Tract Infection (Diagnosis)ArmsUrine Biomarkers
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Nora El MoussaouiLeiden University Center of Infectious Diseases (LUCID), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands n.el_moussaoui@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0047-3531
Esther van AndelDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Martha T van der BeekLeiden University Center of Infectious Diseases (LUCID), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Jessica A VlotLeiden University Center of Infectious Diseases (LUCID), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Manu P BilsenLeiden University Center of Infectious Diseases (LUCID), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Cees van NieuwkoopDepartment of Internal Medicine, HagaZiekenhuis, Den Haag, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0734-0844
Fanny N LauwDepartment of Internal Medicine, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, Netherlands.
Nathalie M DelfosDepartment of Internal Medicine, Alrijne Hospital, Leiderdorp, Netherlands.
Janneke E StalenhoefDepartment of Internal Medicine, OLVG Locatie Oost, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Martijn SijbomDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care/ Campus The Hague, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7264-269X
Abimbola A AkintolaDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care/ Campus The Hague, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9758-0985
Wilco P AchterbergDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care/ Campus The Hague, Leiden University Medical Center, The Hague, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9227-7135
Jelle J GoemanDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Eliane M S LeytenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, Netherlands.
Janneke I M van UhmDepartment of Urology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Paul L A M CorstjensDepartment of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, ZH, Netherlands.
Simon P MooijaartLUMC center for Medicine for Older People, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3106-3568
Simon P ConroyMedical Research Council Unit for lifelong Health and Ageing, University College London, London, UK.
Christa M CobbaertDepartment of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Leo G VisserLeiden University Center of Infectious Diseases (LUCID), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Merel M C LambregtsLeiden University Center of Infectious Diseases (LUCID), Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionUrinary tract infections (UTIs) are highly prevalent and pose a significant burden among older adults. Accurate diagnosis in this population is challenging due to the high prevalence of pre-existing lower urinary tract symptoms, inability to express symptoms and asymptomatic bacteriuria. Current diagnostic tests are unreliable, often resulting in over- and underdiagnosis. A previous pilot study proposed a higher cut-off for pyuria and identified five promising biomarkers for the diagnosis of UTIs in older adults. The UTI-GOLD study aims to validate these five new biomarkers and the higher leucocyte cut-off as a diagnostic tool for UTIs in older people in a real-world setting. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Between August 2024 and December 2027, an observational multicentre diagnostic accuracy study is being conducted across primary, secondary and tertiary healthcare facilities in the Netherlands and the UK. Adults ≥65 years with a suspected UTI will be considered eligible. Patients with pre-existing decision-making incapacity or an indwelling catheter will be excluded. UTI will be defined according to an international consensus-based reference standard. Biomarkers will be measured by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 and CXC motif chemokine ligand 9) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (interleukin 6 and azurocidin). Pyuria will be quantified by automated microscopy and/or flow cytometry. Diagnostic accuracy measures will be calculated using the receiver operating characteristic curves, and sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values will be reported for optimal cut-offs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was reviewed by the local Leiden University Medical Center research committee, who declared on 15 April 2024 that the medical research involving human subject act (Dutch abbreviation: WMO) does not apply to the current study (reference number nWMODIV2_2024025). The study also received approval from the NHS Research Ethics Committee in the UK (reference number 24/LO/0649).The study findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, presented at academic congresses and shared with healthcare providers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study was registered at clinicaltrial.gov on the 24 September 2024 with registration number: NCT06610721.

Indexed as

BiomarkersUrinary Tract InfectionsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLong-Term CareMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicNetherlandsObservational Studies as TopicUnited KingdomBiomarkersBiomarkersInfectious DiseasesUrinary tract infections

Identifiers

PMID40533212
PMCPMC12184357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.