Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40533194›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational allergy2025

Self-reported accidental allergic reactions among patients with challenge-verified food allergy.

Sebastian Vigand Svendsen, Annemarie Schaeffer Senders, Athamaica Ruiz Oropeza, Annmarie Lassen, Carsten Bindslev-Jensen, Charlotte G Mortz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sebastian Vigand SvendsenDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5528-1474
Annemarie Schaeffer SendersDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1899-3798
Athamaica Ruiz OropezaDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5370-6523
Annmarie LassenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4942-6152
Carsten Bindslev-JensenDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8940-038X
Charlotte G MortzDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8710-0829

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFood allergy affects up to 6% of the population and emergency department visits due to accidental food-allergic reactions are increasing. This study evaluated accidental allergic reactions outside the hospital and the number of hospitalizations in food allergic patients as well as the pattern before and after the diagnosis of food allergy by oral food challenge (OFC).

methodsAn electronic questionnaire concerning accidental allergic reactions was sent to 785 patients with challenge verified peanuts, hazelnuts, cow's milk and/or hen's egg allergies at the Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, Denmark.

resultsIn total, 51% (402/785) responded. Among the 357 who reported at least one accidental allergic reaction, 51.5% (184/357) reported a total of six or less reactions, whereas 22.4% (80/357) had experienced a total of ≥21 reactions. Skin symptoms were commonly reported by children/adolescents (n = 277), whereas symptoms from all other organ systems were more frequently reported by adults (n = 80). In total, 61.6% (220/357) experienced at least one accidental allergic reaction, requiring immediate medical attention, which decreased from 77.3% (170/220) before to 55% (121/220) after establishment of the food allergy diagnosis by OFC. A concomitant proportional increase in the number of hospitalizations was identified (63.5% (108/170) to 72.7% (88/121)). LIMITATIONS: We had no exact data on the timing of the accidental allergic reactions for the individual allergens.

conclusionAccidental food-allergic reactions are common and often severe. After the diagnostic OFC, the number of patients with reactions decreased, and the proportion of hospitalizations increased, indicating improved disease and healthcare management.

Indexed as

accidental allergic reactionallergic reactionsanaphylaxisfood allergyoral food challenge

Identifiers

PMID40533194
PMCPMC12176468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.