ReviewMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2025
Lobular Endocervical Glandular Hyperplasia and Related Glandular Disorders: Current Status of Diagnosis with MR Imaging.
Review in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical manifestations and ultrasonographic features of lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia: a retrospective study of 135 patients.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Progressive MRI changes in lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia suggesting malignant transformation: report of two cases with histopathologic correlation.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Gastric-Type Cervical Adenocarcinoma: Clinicopathologic Features, Molecular Landscape, and Therapeutic Challenges.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Peutz-Jeghers syndrome with concurrent lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia and sex cord tumor with annular tubules: a case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia (LEGH) is a rare benign lesion of the uterine cervix that produces gastric-type mucin. First identified in 1999, LEGH is often misdiagnosed as other glandular lesions, including adenocarcinoma, human papillomavirus (HPV)-independent, gastric-type (GAS), due to similar histopathological features. LEGH is now recognized as a precursor to GAS, a malignancy with poor prognosis. This review explores LEGH's pathological and immunohistochemical characteristics and related glandular lesions, focusing on diagnostic approaches using MRI. MRI has proven essential in distinguishing LEGH from other benign cervical cystic lesions and detecting precursor conditions, such as atypical LEGH, before progression to GAS. A hallmark MRI finding for LEGH is the "cosmos pattern," featuring centrally clustered microcysts surrounded by macrocysts, achieving 95.5% specificity when combined with T1-weighted imaging. Cytology and biopsy improve diagnostic accuracy when imaging results are inconclusive, though obtaining high-quality specimens can be challenging due to lesion location. This article reviews cytological findings, the presence of gastric-type mucin, and MRI features useful for differentiating LEGH from benign non-LEGH lesions, as well as for diagnosing precancerous and malignant conditions. Recent advances in research have led to the recognition that GAS is primarily a solid rather than a cystic lesion, contributing to improved diagnostic accuracy of MRI for GAS. However, some GAS cases and atypical LEGH can still exhibit a cosmos pattern on MRI, similar to LEGH, making differentiation challenging. Therefore, we also discuss a diagnostic strategy integrating MRI findings with cytology and presence or absence of gastric-type mucin.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.