ReviewJournal of sleep research2025
Present and Future of Central Disorders of Hypersomnolence.
Review in Journal of sleep research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigation of the "Not Better Explained" Diagnosis Criteria in Sleep Disorder Classifications: A Systematic Content Analysis and Critical Review.Journal of sleep research · 2026Review
- Polysomnographic and Clinical Characteristics of Narcolepsy in Saudi Arabia:Saudi medical journal · 2026Article
- Article
- Sleep and Stroke-An Overlooked Bidirectional Influence: Why Should Sleep and Vascular Neurologists Work Closer?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Present and Future of Central Disorders of Hypersomnolence.Journal of sleep research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Central disorders of hypersomnolence (CDH) are rare neurological conditions lumped by excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) as primary complaint mostly arising at young age, including narcolepsy type 1 (NT1), narcolepsy type 2 (NT2), idiopathic hypersomnia (IH), and Kleine-Levin syndrome (KLS). Advances in clinical and translational research have deepened our understanding of NT1, particularly the loss of hypothalamic hypocretin/orexin-producing neurons, establishing hypocretin deficiency as a reliable disease specific biomarker, although the exact mechanisms of neuronal loss remain unknown. Conversely, the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying NT2, IH, and KLS are still poorly understood, as well as their natural course. Standard diagnostic evaluation primarily relies on clinical symptoms, polysomnography and the multiple sleep latency test, with alternative neurophysiological markers (long term polysomnographic recordings), quantitative signal analysis, and wearables technologies being explored as potential innovative tools. Management remains symptomatic, combining pharmacological treatments such as stimulants, sodium oxybate, and emerging hypocretin/orexin receptor agonists, with nonpharmacological strategies tailored to improve patient quality of life. Notably, new therapies targeting orexin signalling offer promising avenues for transforming treatment approaches, particularly in NT1. Looking ahead, advancing precision medicine approaches and addressing unmet needs in CDH are essential to improve patient outcomes. This review summarises current knowledge and highlights future research directions in CDH pathophysiology, diagnostic approaches and pharmacological management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.