ArticleBone & joint research2025
Increasing reaming depth enhances implant stability while minimizing bone strain.
Article in Bone & joint research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Robotic-referenced automated measurement of acetabular cup orientation on postoperative CT: development and internal validation.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Toward next-generation hip implants: From failure mechanisms to translational design.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026Review
- Navigating change: upholding scientific integrity in an era of innovation.Bone & joint research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Increasing the interference fit of the acetabular component can increase primary stability, but it introduces excessive periacetabular strain during impaction, which can lead to fractures. An optimal outcome following cementless acetabular component impaction is maximal primary implant stability with minimal periacetabular bone strain. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a simple modification to a surgeon's reaming technique can achieve this desirable outcome. Methods: A custom drop rig simulated impaction strikes, seating acetabular components of either 1 mm or 2 mm interference fit into synthetic sawbones with cavities reamed to either a true hemisphere or a hemisphere with an enhanced reaming depth of 2 mm or 4 mm. Synthetic bone strain was recorded using strain gauges, and push-out tests were conducted to assess implant stability. Polar gaps were measured using optimal trackers. Results: Compared to a true hemispherical cavity, enhancing the reaming depth significantly increased the primary stability of the implant (p < 0.001) while reducing both the periacetabular strain and strain deterioration for both 1 mm and 2 mm interference fit components. A 4 mm reaming depth enhanced the primary stability of 1 mm press-fit components to a level almost equivalent to a 2 mm press-fit, albeit reducing strain to the bone. Enhancing reaming depth did not significantly affect polar gap. Conclusion: Enhancing cavity reaming depth is a simple technique to increase the implant primary stability of press-fit uncemented acetabular components, while avoiding any excess in periacetabular strain and the associated fracture risk.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.