Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40533079›Full record

ArticleBone & joint research2025

Increasing reaming depth enhances implant stability while minimizing bone strain.

Monil Karia, Ruben Doyle, Adam Reynolds, Jonathan Jeffers, Justin Cobb

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Monil KariaMSk Lab, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ruben DoyleDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Adam ReynoldsDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Jonathan JeffersDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Justin CobbMSk Lab, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Increasing the interference fit of the acetabular component can increase primary stability, but it introduces excessive periacetabular strain during impaction, which can lead to fractures. An optimal outcome following cementless acetabular component impaction is maximal primary implant stability with minimal periacetabular bone strain. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a simple modification to a surgeon's reaming technique can achieve this desirable outcome. Methods: A custom drop rig simulated impaction strikes, seating acetabular components of either 1 mm or 2 mm interference fit into synthetic sawbones with cavities reamed to either a true hemisphere or a hemisphere with an enhanced reaming depth of 2 mm or 4 mm. Synthetic bone strain was recorded using strain gauges, and push-out tests were conducted to assess implant stability. Polar gaps were measured using optimal trackers. Results: Compared to a true hemispherical cavity, enhancing the reaming depth significantly increased the primary stability of the implant (p < 0.001) while reducing both the periacetabular strain and strain deterioration for both 1 mm and 2 mm interference fit components. A 4 mm reaming depth enhanced the primary stability of 1 mm press-fit components to a level almost equivalent to a 2 mm press-fit, albeit reducing strain to the bone. Enhancing reaming depth did not significantly affect polar gap. Conclusion: Enhancing cavity reaming depth is a simple technique to increase the implant primary stability of press-fit uncemented acetabular components, while avoiding any excess in periacetabular strain and the associated fracture risk.

Identifiers

PMID40533079
PMCPMC12176466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.