ArticleAmerican journal of preventive medicine2025
Evaluating Equity in Universal Suicide Screening: Race/Ethnic Differences in Screening Acceptance and Results.
Article in American journal of preventive medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionYouth suicide is a critical public health issue. Universal screening in healthcare settings can provide clinical pathways for early identification of suicide risk by assessing suicidal thoughts and behaviors and connection to care. This study aimed to examine whether participation in universal suicide risk screening varies by demographic factors, including race/ethnicity, given documented disparities in suicide rates across racial/ethnic groups.
methodsPatient responses on the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions, demographics, and service use factor data were drawn from patient medical records for ambulatory and acute care visits within a large children's hospital system between June 1, 2021, and September 12, 2023, for patients aged ≥10 years who presented for in-person visits in an eligible clinic and were asked to complete a suicide risk screening.
resultsA total of 160,228 visits for patients aged between 10 and 25 (mean age=14.35) years were included in final analyses. Screening was accepted in 76.95% of visits, and of those screens, 15.87% were positive. After controlling for within-patient correlations, race/ethnicity, sex, and age were significant predictors of screening acceptance and result. White and Latine youth were more likely to accept screening, whereas youth of other races/ethnicities, including Asian and Black youth, were less likely to accept screening. White and multiracial youth were more likely to screen positive, whereas Latine, Asian, and Pacific Islander youth were less likely to screen positive.
conclusionsRacial/ethnic differences in screening acceptance and results indicate disparities in suicide risk identification among youth. More work is needed to understand the factors impacting engagement in screening and to ensure equitable suicide risk identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.