ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2025
A human-compatible gradient coil for visualizing ultrasound propagation.
Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The speed of sound in skull-mimicking digital phantoms depends on the microstructure.Physics in medicine and biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In pursuit of a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) based means to tailor transcranial focused ultrasound neuromodulation to a patient's unique skull morphology, this study presents a specialized gradient coil that sensitizes MRI images to ultrasonic vibrations at depths equivalent to the human cortex in a technique called the magnetic resonance hydrophone. The coil comprises a 60 mm diameter, pancake-style design that encodes acoustic displacements into MR images at the cost of an inhomogeneous encoding field. The coil was coupled with a 500 kHz, custom built, ultrasonic transducer. Both the magnetic field gradient of the coil and the acoustic field of the transducer were characterized in benchtop experiments. Acoustic standing waves were estimated in silico. Resulting MR images displayed a sinusoidal phase pattern modulated by both the transducer's acoustic field and the coil's magnetic field gradient. Acoustic pressures were estimated from the resulting images and compared to hydrophone measurements. The pancake-style coil produced a pressure measurement uncertainty pattern due to electronic noise that increased exponentially with depth. Uncertainty at locations between 0 and 30 mm of depth within a region approximately 10 mm wide scaled between approximately 20 kPa and 100 kPa. On average, the MRH underestimated the hydrophone by 12 kPa with the difference between the two following a standard deviation of 21 kPa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.