Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40532532›Full record

ArticleHormones and behavior2025

Behavioral sex differences in the developmental emergence and selectivity of partner preferences in prairie voles.

Ciara A Schaepe, Lisa C Hiura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hormones and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ciara A SchaepeDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, United States of America.
Lisa C HiuraDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, United States of America. Electronic address: Lisa.Hiura@colorado.edu.

Funding

Functional ontogeny of pair bonding neural circuitsDP5OD033437 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI HIURA, LISA · 2022 to 2025
$1.9M
NIH HHS DP5 OD033437
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Convergent evidence across foundational and clinical research has demonstrated the expansive functions and health consequences of adult pair bonding. For decades now, study of the socially monogamous prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster) has provided valuable mechanistic insights into the neuromolecular substrates that enable adult pair bond formation and maintenance. Despite this rapidly growing literature, substantially less is known about the lifespan development of pair bonding behavior and the organization of the monogamous brain. To characterize the age at which prairie voles are capable of pair bonding, we tested if male and female prairie voles between juvenile and adult stages of development could exhibit an other-sex partner preference after 48 h of cohabitation. We found that females paired by early adolescence (P31-36) preferred to huddle with their partner over a novel male conspecific, but this selective social preference was not observed in males until adulthood (P60+). Further, the degree of preference for the pair bond partner was greater in females compared to males, suggesting that there is a robust sex difference in the developmental onset and strength of pair bonding in this species. Identifying the typical developmental trajectories of sex-specific pair bonding behavior will enable novel inquiries into the neuroscience and endocrinology of age-specific social attachments.

Indexed as

ArvicolinaePair BondSex CharacteristicsSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsFemaleMaleSocial BehaviorPair bondSelective affiliationSocial developmentVole

Identifiers

PMID40532532
PMCPMC12227275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.