Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40532203›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2025

Perspectives and Experiences of Family Caregivers Using Supportive Mobile Apps in Dementia Care: Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Research.

Haifei Shen, Yi Han, Wen Shi, Jiangxuan Yu, Xueqi Shan, Hongyao Wang, Junjie Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Supporting Family Caregivers in an Aging Society: The Need for Comprehensive, Evidence-Based Interventions.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haifei ShenSchool of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0004-3107-9345
Yi HanSchool of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0002-7491-0747
Wen ShiSchool of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0008-4073-0274
Jiangxuan YuSchool of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0006-9506-7719
Xueqi ShanSchool of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0003-1060-2267
Hongyao WangSchool of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0003-9385-2674
Junjie WangSchool of Nursing, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID 0009-0004-8572-1348

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSupportive mobile apps are effective tools for family caregivers of persons with dementia to obtain online information and psychological support. Nevertheless, details about the experiences of family caregivers of persons with dementia using mobile apps are limited.

objectiveThis study aimed to synthesize the perspectives and experiences of family caregivers of persons with dementia regarding supportive mobile apps.

methodsWe conducted a synthesis of qualitative research and searched 7 English-language databases and 4 Chinese-language databases. We included qualitative studies (peer-reviewed studies and gray literature) written in English and Chinese on the perspectives and experiences of family caregivers of persons with dementia regarding supportive mobile apps published from database establishment to March 2025. Two researchers independently screened the literature and used the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research to conduct quality assessments on the final included studies. Themes were integrated using the 3-stage thematic synthesis approach by Thomas and Harden.

resultsA preliminary search yielded 4772 studies, of which 12 (0.25%) met the criteria. The included studies were from 7 different countries or regions, of which the only low- or middle-income country was Brazil. The studies involved a total of 232 family caregivers, most of whom were older adults and female. The integration of extracted content resulted in 4 themes: dynamic changes in value perception-complex attitudes toward mobile app adoption; from tools to partners-a technology-empowered multidimensional support system for family caregivers; external and internal barriers-challenges in family caregivers' use of mobile apps; and person-centered design-future directions for improving mobile apps.

conclusionsThis study found that family caregivers' attitudes toward using supportive mobile apps are influenced by their perceived value of mobile apps and their caregiving burden. In addition, such supportive mobile apps serve as valuable tools for family caregivers to enhance their caregiving abilities and efficiency, alleviate the burden of care, improve negative emotions, foster social connections, and promote self-care. Future mobile app design needs to address obstacles such as design flaws, family caregivers' lack of technological literacy, time constraints, concerns about privacy breaches, and other device-related issues, with particular attention to the ease of use of mobile apps. Meanwhile, developers need to commit to designing personalized and multifunctional mobile apps as well as promote online collaboration among members of the care network. Overall, our study offers an important reference for developing person-centered supportive mobile apps for family caregivers of persons with dementia.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42024510905; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024510905.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaMobile ApplicationsAgedFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchSocial SupportAIartificial intelligencecaregiversdementiameta-synthesismobile appqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID40532203
PMCPMC12223452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.