Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40532141›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2025

Development of Machine Learning-Based Risk Prediction Models to Predict Rapid Weight Gain in Infants: Analysis of Seven Cohorts.

Miaobing Zheng, Yuxin Zhang, Rachel A Laws, Peter Vuillermin, Jodie Dodd, Li Ming Wen, Louise A Baur, Rachael Taylor, Rebecca Byrne, Anne-Louise Ponsonby and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Miaobing ZhengInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4151-3502
Yuxin ZhangInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7636-4084
Rachel A LawsInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4328-1116
Peter VuillerminBarwon Health, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6580-0346
Jodie DoddDiscipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6363-4874
Li Ming WenSchool of Public Health and Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1381-4022
Louise A BaurSchool of Public Health and Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4521-9482
Rachael TaylorDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9516-2253
Rebecca ByrneSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0096-3320
Anne-Louise PonsonbyThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6581-3657
Kylie D HeskethInstitute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2702-7110

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rapid weight gain (RWG) during infancy, defined as an upward crossing of one centile line on a weight growth chart, is highly predictive of subsequent obesity risk. Identification of infant RWG could facilitate obesity risk assessment from infancy. Objective: Leveraging machine learning (ML) algorithms, this study aimed to develop and validate risk prediction models to identify infant RWG by the age of 1 year. Methods: Data from 7 Australian and New Zealand cohorts were pooled for risk model development and validation (n=5233). A total of 8 ML algorithms predicted infant RWG using routinely available prenatal and early postnatal factors, including maternal prepregnancy weight status, maternal smoking during pregnancy, gestational age, parity, infant sex, birth weight, any breastfeeding and timing of solids introduction at the age of 6 months. Pooled data were randomly split into a training dataset (70%) and a test dataset (30%) for model training and validation, respectively. Model consistency was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation. Model predictive performance was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and Cohen κ. Results: The average prevalence of infant RWG was 27%. In the training dataset, all ML algorithms showed acceptable to excellent discrimination with AUCs ranging from 0.75 to 0.86. Accuracy, which indicates the overall correctness of the model, ranged from 0.69 to 0.78. Precision, which measures the model's ability to avoid false positives, ranged from 0.68 to 0.77. The spread of sensitivity, specificity, and Cohen κ of all models was 0.68-0.80, 0.65-0.78, and 0.38-0.56, respectively. Of the 8 algorithms, the Gradient Boosting model showed the most favorable predictive accuracy. Validation of the Gradient Boosting model in the testing dataset exhibited excellent discrimination (AUC 0.3-0.6) and good ability to make accurate predictions, particularly true positive cases (with accuracy and sensitivity>0.75), but modest performance for precision (0.57-0.60) and Cohen κ (0.47-0.52). Conclusions: This study developed the first set of ML-based risk prediction models to identify infants' risk of experiencing RWG by the age of 1 year with acceptable accuracy. The models could be feasibly integrated into routine child growth monitoring and may facilitate population-wide early obesity risk assessment in primary health care.

Indexed as

Machine LearningWeight GainAustraliaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNew ZealandRisk Assessmentchildhood obesityinfantsmachine learningpooled analysisrapid weight gainrisk prediction

Identifiers

PMID40532141
PMCPMC12192193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.