ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Robust signalling entropy estimation for biological process characterisation.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Systematic detection of predictive gene sets by semantics-based selection.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationSignalling entropy measures the uncertainty or randomness in the signalling pathways of a biological system. It reflects the complexity and variability of protein interactions and can indicate how information is processed within cells. Higher signalling entropy often indicates a more dynamic and adaptive state, whereas lower entropy may imply a more stable and less responsive condition. Estimating signalling entropy has become a valuable method for studying and understanding the complexity of biological processes. This measure has the potential to shed valuable insights into various phenomena, including the mechanisms behind cell fate decisions, drug resistance, and disease progression. To examine the molecular changes within a system, signalling entropy is quantified through the integration of expression measurements and protein interaction networks. Experimental and computational issues, such as false positives and additional noise, can all compromise the accuracy of protein interaction networks. Correction methods can be used to mitigate spurious results, correct for experimental bias, and integrate data from multiple sources. However, to date, the effect of such approaches on entropy calculations, together with the impact of different underlying networks, has yet to be evaluated.
resultsHere, we investigate how the topology of distinct protein interaction networks can alter the entropy calculation. We examine the entropy derived from different protein interaction networks. Additionally, we systematically evaluate different correction strategies, outlining their benefits and drawbacks along with identifying the most effective approaches for specific types of data and biological scenarios. This protocol outlines how to optimize the reliability of entropy calculations and ultimately leads to a deeper comprehension of biological processes and disease mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.