Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40532095›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2025

The stretch-shortening cycle effect is not associated with cortical or spinal excitability modulations.

Lea-Fedia Rissmann, Brent James Raiteri, Wolfgang Seiberl, Tobias Siebert, Daniel Hahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lea-Fedia RissmannHuman Movement Science, Faculty of Sport Science, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1395-1529
Brent James RaiteriHuman Movement Science, Faculty of Sport Science, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2078-9075
Wolfgang SeiberlInstitute of Sport Science, Department of Human Sciences, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6012-1301
Tobias SiebertDepartment of Motion and Exercise Science, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4090-5480
Daniel HahnHuman Movement Science, Faculty of Sport Science, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9401-5478

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) 354863464Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) HA 5977/5-1,2Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) SE 2109/2-1,2Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) SI 841/15-1,2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is unclear whether cortical and spinal excitability modulations contribute to enhanced stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) performance. Therefore, this study investigated cortical and spinal excitability modulations during and following shortening of SSC contractions compared with pure shortening (SHO) contractions. Participants (n = 18) performed submaximal voluntary plantar flexion contractions while prone on the dynamometer bench. The right foot was strapped onto the dynamometer's footplate attachment, and the resultant ankle joint torque and crank arm angle were recorded. Cortical and spinal excitability modulations of the soleus muscle were analysed by eliciting compound muscle actional potentials via electrical nerve stimulation, cervicomedullary motor-evoked potentials (CMEPs) via electrical stimulation of the spinal cord, and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) via magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex. Mean torque following stretch was significantly increased by 7 ± 3% (P = 0.029) compared with the fixed-end reference (REF) contraction, and mean torque during shortening of SSC compared with SHO was significantly increased by 12 ± 24% (P = 0.046). Mean steady-state torque was significantly lower by 13 ± 3% (P = 0.006) and 9 ± 12% (P = 0.011) following SSC compared with REF and SHO, respectively. Mean steady-state torque was not significantly different following SHO compared with REF (7 ± 8%, P = 0.456). CMEPs and MEPs were also not significantly different during shortening of SSC compared with SHO (P ≥ 0.885) or during the steady state of SSC, SHO and REF (P ≥ 0.727). Therefore, our results indicate that SSC performance was not associated with cortical or spinal excitability modulations during or after shortening, but rather driven by mechanical mechanisms triggered during active stretch. KEY POINTS: A stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) effect of 12% was observed during EMG-matched submaximal voluntary contractions of the human plantar flexors. The SSC effect was neither associated with cortical or spinal excitability modulations nor with stretch-reflex activity. The SSC effect was likely driven by mechanical mechanisms related to active muscle stretch, which have long-lasting effects during shortening. Residual force depression following SSC was not attenuated by the long-lasting mechanical mechanisms triggered during active muscle stretch. Steady-state torques were lower following shortening of SSCs versus pure shortening and fixed-end contractions at the same final ankle joint angle, but the torque differences were not correlated with cortical or spinal excitability modulations.

Indexed as

Motor CortexMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalSpinal CordAdultElectric StimulationEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleTorqueYoung Adultforce depressionforce enhancementperformance enhancementstretch reflextriceps surae

Identifiers

PMID40532095
PMCPMC12320215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.