ArticlePloS one2025
Digital study and correlation analysis of sagittal balance parameters in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: A comparative study with healthy adolescents.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can pelvic incidence be used to analyse the sagittal profile in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A retrospective analysis of 100 patients.Spine deformity · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Surface Topography for the Assessment of Spinal Alignment: A Cross-Sectional Study of Biomechanical Correlates.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to compare sagittal spinal parameters between healthy adolescents and those with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), identify factors influencing disease progression, and provide insights for optimizing preoperative assessments.
methodsSagittal full-spine radiographs from 40 healthy adolescents and 41 AIS patients (aged 10-18 years) were analyzed using Mimics 21.0 software. Fifteen parameters, including spinopelvic angle (SPA), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), and pelvic tilt (PT), were measured. Statistical analyses included logistic regression to identify predictors of AIS and sex-based subgroup comparisons.
resultsSPA was significantly higher in AIS patients compared to controls (median: 176.48° vs. 169.64°, P = 0.008) and emerged as the sole predictor of AIS (odds ratio = 1.568, 95% CI = 1.129-2.177, P = 0.007). Sex differences revealed higher spinal tilt (ST) in female AIS patients (P = 0.034), while males exhibited elevated TK (P = 0.006) and SPA (P = 0.002). Correlations among parameters highlighted strong associations between LL and pelvic incidence (PI, r = 0.682) and between SPA and pelvic tilt (PT, r=-0.537).
conclusionIncreased SPA is a critical indicator of AIS, necessitating preoperative evaluation of sagittal spinopelvic alignment. Female patients require heightened attention to spinal tilt. Future studies should expand sample sizes and integrate multi-planar analyses to refine clinical strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.