ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Evaluating InferVision's Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) algorithm for Tuberculosis (TB) screening, Lusaka, Zambia.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of InferRead DR Chest for tuberculosis (TB) screening in a high HIV and TB burden setting. The study assessed the performance of InferRead DR Chest using anonymized chest X-ray images from an active TB case finding study in Lusaka, Zambia, for individuals aged 15 and older. The Xpert MTB/RIF or MTB culture was the composite reference standard. Performance was evaluated using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC), and a binary classification point was selected where the sensitivity aligned with the WHO target product profile for TB screening tools. Of the 1,890 chest X-ray images that met the inclusion criteria, 91.5% of participants reported at least one TB symptom. The median age was 38 years (IQR: 29-47), and 1,186 (62.8%) were male. From the study sample, 449 participants (23.8%) reported a history of previous TB, and 704 (37.2%) were HIV positive. Among the analyzed images, 289 (15.3%) were classified as TB positive based on the composite reference standard test results. The overall area under the curve (AUC) was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78-0.83). Among individuals with a history of previous TB and those who were HIV positive, the AUCs were 0.71 (95% CI: 0.63-0.79) and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.72-0.82), respectively. At a sensitivity of 90.3% (95% CI: 86.3%-93.5%), InferRead DR Chest achieved a specificity of 39.2% (95% CI: 36.8%-41.7%) at TB score cut point of 0.12. InferRead DR Chest had acceptable performance in our population. Additional training and piloting of InferRead DR Chest in this population is recommended.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.