ArticlePloS one2025
Budding metaphors: Input-output effects in metaphor production.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Child-Directed Speech Is Semantically Constrained: Evidence From Metaphoricity and Concreteness.Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents a longitudinal analysis of input-output effects in the production of metaphoric expressions by children aged two to five. The group case-study design adopted in this project involved longitudinally sampled corpora of naturalistic conversations between six English- and five Polish-speaking children and their primary caregivers, analysed by means of a usage-based approach to metaphor identification in child speech (UBAMICS) recently developed for English and adapted for Polish. Overall, 146,103 expressions were traced back to underlying metaphorical mappings in the densely sampled English corpora, and 22,909 in the less densely sampled Polish corpora. The data demonstrate clear input-output effects in the acquisition of conventional metaphoric expressions, both for primary conceptual metaphors that bring abstract domains closer to our embodied experience (e.g., Your gran is such a warm person) and for resemblance metaphors that map properties of familiar concepts onto those of less familiar ones based on their physical or behavioral resemblance (e.g., You're my treasure). They are discussed in the context of two leading theories: Conceptual Metaphor Theory and Pragmatic Theory, highlighting to what extent they can account for our findings. A novel Usage-Based account is proposed to explain those findings which are problematic or when viewed through the lens of the current accounts of metaphor acquisition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.