ArticlePloS one2025
Infection prevention knowledge and perceptions: a nationwide survey among nurses and physicians in adult intensive care units in Finland.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare-associated infections are a major complication of care for patients in intensive care, causing costs and additional mortality. Infection prevention practices, such as hand hygiene, have been suboptimal globally. This study aimed to explore the level of knowledge and perceptions of critical care staff regarding healthcare-associated infections as insufficient knowledge contributes to an increased burden of these infections.
methodsA nationwide survey of physicians and nurses working in intensive care units of Finnish tertiary care hospitals was conducted to gain knowledge and explore perceptions regarding the prevention of healthcare-associated infections in intensive care units. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the study data, and a mainly nonparametric method was used to compare the groups.
resultsThe respondents demonstrated moderately good knowledge of hand hygiene and infection prevention, with a median of 36 correct responses (Q1, Q3: 34, 37). However, there were notable gaps in their knowledge in infection prevention regarding the routes of infection transmission, with a median score of 4 (Q1, Q3: 4, 6). Conversely, perceptions of infection prevention were generally positive. The median score for perceptions was 51 (Q1, Q3: 47, 55), but no significant association was found between perceptions and knowledge levels.
conclusionsThe level of knowledge about healthcare-associated infections is not satisfactory. In particular, there is a lack of in-depth understanding of the mechanisms of infection transmission and prevention. Providing unit-tailored feedback on performance, along with education on the transmission mechanisms and infection prevention for healthcare workers is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.