Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40531928›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Advancing breast cancer prediction: Comparative analysis of ML models and deep learning-based multi-model ensembles on original and synthetic datasets.

Kazi Arman Ahmed, Israt Humaira, Ashiqur Rahman Khan, Md Shamim Hasan, Mukitul Islam, Anik Roy, Mehrab Karim, Mezbah Uddin, Ashique Mohammad, Md Doulotuzzaman Xames

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kazi Arman AhmedDepartment of Industrial and Production Engineering, Military Institute of Science and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Israt HumairaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Military Institute of Science and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Ashiqur Rahman KhanDepartment of Industrial and Production Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-1999-3041
Md Shamim HasanDepartment of Industrial and Production Engineering, Military Institute of Science and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mukitul IslamDepartment of Industrial and Production Engineering, Military Institute of Science and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Anik RoyDepartment of Industrial and Production Engineering, Military Institute of Science and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mehrab KarimDepartment of Industrial and Production Engineering, Military Institute of Science and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Mezbah UddinDepartment of Industrial and Production Engineering, Military Institute of Science and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Ashique MohammadDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Md Doulotuzzaman XamesDepartment of Industrial and Production Engineering, Military Institute of Science and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-8755-5778

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is a significant global health concern with rising incidence and mortality rates. Current diagnostic methods face challenges, necessitating improved approaches. This study employs various machine learning (ML) algorithms, including KNN, SVM, ANN, RF, XGBoost, ensemble models, AutoML, and deep learning (DL) techniques, to enhance breast cancer diagnosis. The objective is to compare the efficiency and accuracy of these models using original and synthetic datasets, contributing to the advancement of breast cancer diagnosis. The methodology comprises three phases, each with two stages. In the first stage of each phase, stratified K-fold cross-validation was performed to train and evaluate multiple ML models. The second stage involved DL-based and AutoML-based ensemble strategies to improve prediction accuracy. In the second and third phases, synthetic data generation methods, such as Gaussian Copula and TVAE, were utilized. The KNN model outperformed others on the original dataset, while the AutoML approach using H2OXGBoost using synthetic data also showed high accuracy. These findings underscore the effectiveness of traditional ML models and AutoML in predicting breast cancer. Additionally, the study demonstrated the potential of synthetic data generation methods to improve prediction performance, aiding decision-making in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningMachine LearningAlgorithmsFemaleHumansSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID40531928
PMCPMC12176164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.