ArticlePloS one2025
Vicarious post-traumatic growth in Chinese oncology nurses: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors influencing vicarious trauma among Generation Z nursing interns in ICU practice: a cross-sectional study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- The role of psychological flexibility in the relationship between empathy and flourishing among clinical nurses: a cross-sectional mediation analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Vicarious Resilience in Hospital Nurses: A Concept Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the traditional Chinese culture, vicarious trauma poses a significant threat to oncology nurses who are frequently exposed to death and illness. This exposure can undermine both the physical and mental health of these nurses, potentially affecting team retention. Vicarious post-traumatic growth, a positive outcome of trauma exposure, has been shown to mitigate the adverse effects of vicarious trauma. As a result, fostering vicarious post-traumatic growth is an important area of focus. However, the prevalence of vicarious post-traumatic growth and its influencing factors is limited. The relationship between vicarious post-traumatic growth and vicarious trauma also remains unclear. This study used a cross-sectional survey design. A total of 445 questionnaire were collected between October and December 2023, with 401 valid responses retained for analysis. Participants completed questionnaires that included demographic and work-related variables questionnaire, the Vicarious Trauma Questionnaire (VTQ) and the Chinese-Post Traumatic Growth Inventory (C-PTGI). Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis, t-tests or ANOVA (F-tests) and multiple regression analysis were conducted to investigate the level of vicarious post-traumatic growth and the modifiable factors among oncology nurses. Multicollinearity diagnostics confirmed no significant collinearity among variables. This study found that Chinese oncology nurses developed high levels of vicarious post-traumatic growth (n = 401,68.67 ± 18.88) based on medium levels of vicarious trauma (n = 401,66.32 ± 22.50). In the multiple regression analysis, vicarious trauma (B = -0.129, 95%CI -0.211 ~ -0.046), social support (B = 7.963, 95%CI 4.680 ~ 11.247), and job satisfaction (B = 7.418, 95%CI 5.444 ~ 9.391) were independently associated with vicarious post-traumatic growth. These findings have important implications for the future implementation of effective interventions to improve the level of vicarious post-traumatic growth. Recommendations include death education, emotional labor strategies training, mindfulness therapy, psychological counseling, and Balint groups, which can improve the level of vicarious post-traumatic growth in Chinese oncology nurses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.