ArticlePloS one2025
Machine learning-based drought prediction using Palmer Drought Severity Index and TerraClimate data in Ethiopia.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nanotechnology for Drought Mitigation and Water Conservation: Opportunities and Limitations.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Runoff Potential Index (RPI): 3D modelling of surface-driven hydrological dynamics for drought resilience.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate drought prediction is essential for proactive water management and agricultural planning, especially in regions like Ethiopia that are highly susceptible to climate variability. This study investigates the classification of the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) using machine learning models trained on TerraClimate data, incorporating variables such as precipitation, temperature, soil moisture, and vapor pressure deficit. We employed several classifiers Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM), k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Tree, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, Naive Bayes, AdaBoost, and XGBoost with Logistic Regression serving as a baseline statistical approach for comparison. To address data imbalance across drought classes, we applied a hybrid resampling method combining manual upsampling and SMOTE. Hyperparameter tuning was conducted using grid search and cross-validation. Random Forest outperformed all models, achieving an accuracy of 71.18%, F1-score of 0.71, and ROC AUC of 0.9000. Gradient Boosting and SVM also performed well with ROC AUC values of 0.8982 and 0.8681, respectively. SHAP analysis revealed that soil moisture, precipitation, and vapor pressure deficit were the most influential features in predicting drought severity. For benchmarking, an ARIMA (3,1,2) time-series model was applied but yielded poor performance (RMSE = 1.789, R² = -0.077), confirming the advantages of non-linear machine learning techniques for complex climate data. The results highlight the utility of ensemble learning in environmental modelling, offering valuable insights for drought early warning systems and climate resilience planning in Ethiopia. Future work should explore integrating localized predictors and real-time data to enhance prediction robustness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.