ArticlePloS one2025
Performance of teenaged action video game players on the Developmental Eye Movement and King-Devick tests.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Action video game (AVG) players have been reported to demonstrate improved perceptual, cognitive, and motor skills, as well as enhanced eye movements such as saccade latency and accuracy. This study examined if these improvements are also observed in two common clinical eye movement assessments, the Developmental Eye Movement (DEM) and King-Devick tests. Ninth and tenth graders (15-16 years old) without learning disabilities or oculomotor dysfunctions, and who do not regularly play ball sports were tested in the DEM and King-Devick tests in random order. Those playing AVG ≥ 5 hours per week were included in the AVG group, and those playing ≤ 1 h per week were included in the non-video game group (NVG). Participants were asked to read quickly while reading speed and errors were recorded. Two DEM subtests were read vertically and one subtest was read from left to right. All King-Devick subtests were read from left to right. Forty participants (20 AVG, 20 NVG, 15 girls, mean age: 15.7 ± 0.1 years) were included. AVG players were significantly faster in their horizontal DEM times (AVG: 26 ± 5, NVG: 34 ± 7 sec, p < 0.001) and King-Devick times (AVG: 14 ± 2, NVG: 16 ± 4 sec, p = 0.034), but not in their vertical DEM times (AVG: 26 ± 3, NVG: 28 ± 5 sec p = 0.063). King-Devick and horizontal DEM times were significantly correlated for the entire sample (p < 0.01). Teenagers who regularly played AVGs performed better on the DEM and King-Devick tests, indicating that regularly playing this genre of AVGs may enhance oculomotor skills and visual processing speed. Clinicians should take this into account when interpreting results of these clinical tests.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.