ArticlePloS one2025
Obstetricians' views on extending the 12-week abortion limit in Belgium: A qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study explores the views of obstetricians on a potential extension of the 12-week limit on elective abortion in Belgium. It aims to investigate perspectives from a distinct group of providers who already have experience with later abortion, albeit provided on medical grounds. These insights could help identify and navigate perceived challenges and opportunities of extending the abortion time limit.
methodsWe conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 23 hospital obstetricians who are involved in abortion on medical grounds in Flanders, Belgium. We coded and thematically analyzed interview transcripts with NVivo software.
resultsWe discerned three major themes in obstetricians' views: 1) Concerns about later abortion techniques; 2) Psychosocial hardships justifying later abortion; and 3) Fetal viability and feticide considerations. Minor themes are: 4) Limited impact on abortion for fetal anomaly; 5) Abortion travel and associated harms; and 6) Sex-selective abortion.
conclusionFlemish hospital obstetricians highlight both moral and technical challenges associated with extending the abortion time limit, primarily relating to surgical abortion methods and the organization of care. This study finds that, if an extended limit were to be adopted, additional policies and safeguards would facilitate implementation and foster interest among obstetricians in providing services. These include education and technical training of providers in later abortion care, centralization of provision, appropriate facilities, prepared teams, value workshops, and adequate state financing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.