ArticlePloS one2025
A one-arm pilot trial of a telehealth CBT-based group intervention targeting transdiagnostic risk for emotional distress.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on mental health, straining an already overburdened healthcare system and highlighting health inequity issues. To streamline treatment efforts, targeting transdiagnostic risk factors for symptoms of emotional distress through a modular, transdiagnostic approach via telehealth may help to expand access to mental health treatment. Three transdiagnostic risk factors for emotional distress disorders that emerged as important treatment targets during the pandemic are anxiety sensitivity (AS) (i.e., fear of anxious arousal), intolerance of uncertainty (IU) (i.e., distress when confronted with uncertainty), and loneliness. To target AS, IU, and loneliness, we completed a pilot feasibility, acceptability, and utility trial of Coping Crew, our group, telehealth-delivered transdiagnostic treatment protocol. The 17 participants (Mage = 22.00, SD = 4.46; 71% female) rated the intervention and study protocol as feasible to deliver and acceptable and useful to address intervention targets. Evidence was mixed regarding feasibility, acceptability, and usefulness of the mobile app: 94% of the participants (n = 16) completed at least one daily survey 80% of the time, but only 35% of the participants (n = 6) completed at least 80% of the mobile app surveys over the course of the intervention. Most participants rated use of the app as acceptable and relevant to psychological improvements made due to the intervention. Exploratory analyses suggest potential reductions in transdiagnostic risk factors at post-intervention, which were maintained at 1- and 3-month follow-up. Detailed effect size estimates are provided. However, these should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size and exploratory nature of the study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.