ArticlePloS one2025
Relationship network, knowledge transfer and open innovation behavior of SMEs from China.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the context of globalization and digital transformation, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) face increasing resource constraints that limit traditional innovation models. This study investigates how Chinese SMEs' relational networks influence their open innovation behaviors, examining the mediating role of knowledge transfer and the moderating effect of innovation strategic orientation. Through questionnaire data collected from 329 SMEs' middle and senior managers, we find that: (1) Firm relational networks significantly enhance knowledge transfer; (2) Innovation strategic orientation positively moderates the relationship between networks and knowledge transfer; and (3) Both networks and knowledge transfer exhibit strong positive impacts on SMEs' open innovation behaviors, with knowledge transfer acting as a partial mediator. The research reveals the mechanism through which relational networks drive open innovation via knowledge mobilization while highlighting the critical regulatory role of strategic innovation focus. These findings contribute to understanding open innovation dynamics in emerging markets by demonstrating the sequential pathway: network development → knowledge acquisition → innovation outcomes. For practitioners, the study underscores the strategic value of cultivating robust relational networks aligned with innovation objectives, enhancing internal knowledge circulation capabilities, and maintaining adaptive strategic orientations to capitalize on external opportunities. The research provides theoretical and practical guidance for SMEs seeking sustainable competitive advantages through open innovation strategies in knowledge-based economies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.