ArticlePloS one2025
Changes in risk habits and influencing factors in the Taiwan oral cancer screening program.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cultural carcinogens in oral squamous cell carcinoma risk across global populations.Oncoscience · 2026Review
- Factors affecting women's participation in cervical cancer screening through the theory of planned behavior: a cross- sectional study in Türkiye.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Global, regional, and national burden of lip and oral cavity cancer attributable to smoking, 1990-2021: A secondary dataset analysis of GBD 2021.Tobacco induced diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines changes in oral risk habits and identifies factors influencing these changes among participants in a population-based oral cancer screening program to support effective public health interventions. The study included 2,569,920 individuals aged 30 and older who participated in Taiwan's Oral Cancer Screening Program at least twice between 2010 and 2021. Changes in cigarette smoking and betel quid chewing were assessed between the first and last screenings and categorized as improved, unchanged, or worsened. A logistic regression model evaluated factors associated with habit improvement, including baseline oral habits, sex, age, education, screening adherence, and oral potentially malignant disorder (OPMD) findings. Among participants, 25.3% improved their oral habits. Baseline habits influenced how OPMD screening results affected behavior change. Among smokers, a positive screening result increased the likelihood of quitting or reducing smoking (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.18, 95% CI 1.16-1.20). However, among betel quid chewers, whether or not they smoked, a positive screening result was negatively associated with improved habits (aOR 0.79-0.88). Being female, older, college-educated, and regularly attending screenings were positively linked to behavior improvement. The program led to habit improvements in about one-quarter of participants, particularly older individuals, those with higher education, and frequent attendees. However, a diagnosis of OPMD motivated change only among smokers, not those engaging in both smoking and betel quid chewing, highlighting a lack of awareness in high-risk groups. Strengthening collaboration between health organizations and the screening program could enhance public awareness, improve program effectiveness, reduce oral cancer incidence, and lower long-term healthcare costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.